Rationale: In line with our vote on Snapshot, we support this proposal as we consider it positive that Uniswap has a specialised team dedicated to business development, marketing and exploring possibilities for grants and inventions.
We understand that 6 months is a reasonable period of time, after which the DAO will be able to analyse whether or not to continue, and under what conditions, based in the results obtained.
Rationale: We support this proposal as Tally has become an essential service for many decentralised governance and especially for Uniswap, and the proposed improvements and new features will enhance the experience and the way governance is exercised, thus strengthening the DAO.
However, we strongly encourage the proposer @dennisonb, if the snapshot proposal is approved, to clarify and deepen some issues raised by other delegates, such as all the suggestions and questions made by @tane, which we consider very important to be resolved before the on-chain vote, and even the question we asked that has not been answered, in the sense of clarifying whether the improvements and new features proposed in the roadmap to be financed by Uniswap will be exclusive and specifically developed tailor-made for Uniswap or whether they will be general features offered to any other user/DAO and, if so, which other users/DAOs besides Uniswap will finance them.