She256 Delegate Platform

Key Info

Overview

Our governance team at she256 carries out our nonprofit’s broader mission of increasing diversity in the crypto space, while specifically striving towards increasing empowerment, equity, accountability, and democratic access in governance.

she256 fundamentally believes that blockchain technology will shape our future financial and governance structures. We exists to help build these systems so they are representative of the global, diverse population which they intend to serve.

We see Uniswap as a core functionality for users both on Ethereum and across chains. It provides a safe, secure and mature platform, which caters for both experienced users and newcomers. By providing a crucial service to all users, we believe Uniswap provides an equitable experience.

Skills and areas of expertise

Our core governance team represents a wide range of expertise: we’re made up of engineers who focus on protocols, Ethereum infrastructure, smart contract engineering, and ecosystem developers, as well as investors and legal and policy expertise. The she256 team as a whole comprises of individuals active in web3, contributing to projects and entities such NEAR, Celo, Opyn, Variant, Union, Metamask, Orca, Gitcoin, and many more.

What voters can expect of us

  • Consistent participation in discussions and thoughtfulness around voting
  • Governance participation aligned with our core governance values of Equity, Accountability, Democratizing Access, and Empowerment
  • Read more about our voting principles here

Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives

We vote FOR - we believe the liquidity incentive campaigns will push the ecosystem forward in a positive manner.

Uniswap Unleashed

We vote FOR - we support the Uniswap Foundation in implementing the strategic priorities outlined for the coming years.

[Temp Check] Treasury Delegation Round 2

We vote AGAINST - our rationale is similar to what other delegates such as L2Beat have mentioned. We don’t believe this initiative necessary solves the underlying issues, and other approaches could better solve issues around reaching quorum and delegate incentives.

We voted in favor of the first round of this trial feeling optimistic that this approach could ease the challenges of reaching quorum while working through some of the delegate incentive concerns. However, we haven’t seen evidence to suggest significant progress towards aligning long term incentives, which is why we do not feel the continuation of this experiment is in the best interest of the DAO.

1 Like

BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package

We vote FOR - with this budget, we support the incentives being proposed and believe it will benefit the ecosystem.

UAC Renewal

We vote FOR - the committee has continued to do good work and deliver value to the DAO.

Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)

We vote FOR - we support the suggested rebalancing to respond to changes in the market and mitigate risk