We think this is a very good start, and we would like to propose adding some more items to the list of principles and guides for delegate decision-making in the governance of the DAO Uniswap:
- Delegates should analyse each proposal professionally, without falling into superficial analysis or voting according to majority sentiment, and in this regard should provide constructive feedback to third party proposals, asking questions to resolve unclear or doubtful questions.
- Delegates should inform the community if they consider that a proposal is superficial, light, unclear or unsubstantiated and needs to be improved or deepened before it is submitted to a vote.
- Delegates must not become carterised and must protect the protocol from other delegates who make proposals only for personal gain but which do not serve the protocol.
- Delegates should answer questions and queries that may be raised about their own proposals as fully as possible in a clear and reasoned manner, and be prepared to improve, expand or modify them in response to feedback or questions received, without becoming defensive or offensive in response to questions or queries that may arise.
- Delegates should always show respect for others, accept opposing views and avoid personal attacks.
Of course, these points could be rephrased or summarised, but we believe they are important points to consider when regulating the expected behaviour of delegates.