Thanks @dennisonb for the RFC. Tally has been instrumental to Uniswap’s governance infrastructure, and we unequivocally support this proposal. However, to maximize value for both parties, several critical points must be addressed:
- Annual $250k Budget Verification
- Tally must provide detailed cost breakdowns including developer headcount, time allocation, and monthly subscription costs and KPIs such as usage rate for each development function.
- Based on our Optimism Grant Council experience, implementing an RFP process that clearly defines Uniswap DAO’s requirements would ensure optimal fund allocation and fairness.
- Exclusivity Concerns
- The proposal should address whether the functionality funded by
Uniswap will be provided to other DAOs. The features that become widely available requires clear justification.
- The proposal should address whether the functionality funded by
Given Tally’s proven track record in advancing Uniswap governance, we advocate establishing a sustainable funding framework to ensure their continued partnership. Their expertise remains valuable, but funding decisions must align with proper governance protocols.