Establish Uniswap Governance as “DUNI,” a Wyoming DUNA (Snapshot)
We voted For: We are very excited to see the DUNI go into effect soon. As members of the UAC, we have kept up with the foundation’s work and are very satisfied with the current output. Props to everyone involved!
Unichain Co-Incentives Growth Management Plan (On Chain)
We voted For: Voting in line with our prior snapshot vote. We believe the commentary and adjustments made are adequate.
Establish Uniswap Governance as “DUNI,” a Wyoming DUNA (On Chain)
We voted For: Voting in line with the recent snapshot vote. Excited to see the DUNI officially being implemented!
Launching Uniswap v3 on Ronin with co-incentives (Snapshot)
We voted Deploy $500k in UNI Incentives: The proposal is well written and while on the higher side, our support falls in line with our general sentiment towards incentive proposals. With DUNA being set up soon, and hopefully fee switch on the horizon, the co-incentives are rather attractive in our opinion to the DAO.
GLI — Treasury delegation Round 2 (Snapshot)
GLI — Incentivized Delegation Vaults (Snapshot)
We voted For & For: With the recent issues with voter turnout and hitting quorum, we are in favor of adding at least 10m more UNI to the active voting pool. We believe the first round of treasury delegations worked well and the incentivized delegation vaults we believe are a worthwhile attempt to attract more delegations, and relatively, the budgets are very reasonable.
Treasury Delegation Round 2 Elections (Snapshot)
We voted Proxy 10%, Curia 10%, KPK 10%, Event Horizon 20%, SEEDGov 10%, Tane 10%. Arana Digital 20%, Avantgarde 10%: These are the teams we have known to be active in the Uniswap community and who we are confident would be good treasury delegation stewards. We did double weight on Arana and Event Horizon as we’ve worked closely with both and are believe they are very deserving.
Grow Uniswap on Plasma (Snapshot)
We voted Allocate $250k: In favor of allocating additional $250k towards Plasma. Plasma has come out as one of the strongest chains in recent past and a $250k + $250k match to their $3m to $5m incentives makes a lot of sense.
Uniswap Community Proposal Factory (Snapshot)
We voted Abstain: We think overall, we love the idea, but just aren’t convinced the current parameters are the best way forward. Would be in favor of discussing the setup, committee, and scope in coming weeks and revisiting the vote.
UNIfication (Snapshot)
We voted For: Super excited to see the culmination of years of work. We are aligned with this vision and enjoyed the workshops and conversations we had in Devcon this week. Great work to everyone involved!
Strategic Renewal of Gnosis, Linea, and Mantle Deployments (Snapshot)
We voted For: We think continuing these specific chains’ Oku deployments makes sense as they have had sufficient attraction.
Strategic Renewal of Gnosis, Linea, and Mantle Deployments (On Chain)
We voted For: Similar reasoning to the prior snapshot vote. We believe continuing these deployments is worthwhile for the DAO.
UNIfication (On Chain)
We voted For: Similar reasoning to the prior snapshot vote. Excited to see the fee switch finally implemented!
[Temp Check] Protocol Fee Expansion: Eight More Chains and Remaining Mainnet V3 Pools (Temp Check)
We voted For: In line with expectations we had when Fee switch parameters were first turned on. Glad to see traction so far.
Protocol Fee Expansion: Vote 1 (On Chain)
Protocol Fee Expansion: Vote 2 (On Chain)
We voted For & For: In line with out Snapshot reasoning above, these votes are expected and no surprises are presented for the vote here.
[RFC] Governance Process Upgrade: Establishing a Statute of Limitations for Temperature Checks (Temp Check)
We voted For: We think it makes sense to have a time limit on proposals that pass the temp check but don’t move forward to an on chain vote. If votes are going to be pushed later on, a simple revote on snapshot makes sense.