Argonaut Delegate Platform

Delegation Pitch
1

Argonaut Delegate Platform

Delegate Name: Argonaut

Forum: Argonaut

Delegate Address: 0x21b3B193B71680E2fAfe40768C03a0Fd305EFa75

Twitter Profile: Argonaut

Languages: English, Spanish

Our Voting History: Boardroom

About Us:

Argonaut is a team of highly motivated crypto enthusiasts eager to participate in governance and make meaningful improvements where we see opportunities. Our team is diverse, with expertise on DeFi analysis, smart contract development, and research.

We chose the name Argonaut to symbolize our commitment to governance across various DAOs. Like Jason’s mythological crew, we bring together a range of skills and a pioneering spirit, dedicated to exploring new challenges and leading with innovation in decentralized governance.

Main Focus:

Our focus areas are security, fairness, and innovation.

Conflicts of Interest:

As a young team, we are currently active only in Arbitrum governance as delegates, but we plan to expand our involvement in other DAOs as we grow. We are committed to maintaining transparency in our decisions, with no hidden agendas.

1 Like
2
3
  • Proposal: Deploy Uniswap v3 on X Layer
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We believe deploying Uniswap on X Layer is beneficial; however, we do not support Uniswap incentives at this stage of the network. Since the proposal has been modified to reflect this feedback, we are in support of it.
1 Like
4
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Yes
  • Reasoning: We support this initiative as it’s a great way to attract active delegates. In our opinion, the current number of spots is too low and should be increased to at least 25. We hope the program allows more participants in the third cycle.
1 Like
5
  • Proposal: Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Just like the voting on Snapshot, we maintain our support for this initiative, and in the third cycle, we will wait for modifications that allow a greater number of delegates to join the program.
1 Like
6
  • Proposal: Proposal to active 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We’ll be consistent with our vote in the Temperature Check. We believe this experiment is worthwhile and support adding more fee tiers on Base. For this reason, we support this proposal.
7
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] - Ethereum Foundation Attackathon Sponsorship
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Abstain
  • Reasoning: After careful consideration of this proposal, we have decided to abstain from voting. While we recognize that such proposals can add value to the ecosystem, we do not believe that Uniswap will capture the majority of this value. Given that our vote reflects the interests of Uniswap, we prefer not to support the proposed options.
8
  • Proposal: Uniswap Delegate Race Tiebreaker
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Both
  • Reasoning: As the approved tie-breaker method resulted in a tie, we will support the “Both” option. We believe that using an unapproved tie-breaker method would be unfair, and the most equitable solution is to include both delegates in the program. Thank you to the organizers for considering our concerns!