[Temp Check] - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement (Snapshot)
We voted For: We’ve interacted with the SEAL team across various DAOs and know they are a strong and competent team. This proposal with a whitehat bounty makes sense and we think is valuable if the protocol were to ever reach that level of loss.
[TEMP CHECK] Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo (Snapshot)
We voted For: We are in favor of the $UNI Incentives as Celo has already promised to deploy millions of incentives to Uniswap pools. This sets a good precedent and for a tenured and OG chain, this makes a lot of sense for us.
[TEMP CHECK] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3 (Snapshot)
We voted Against: This was a pretty tough decision and we don’t have strong opinions either way here. We appreciate the incentives from Metal for Uniswap and makes us at least consider the proposal. We think ideally, we would like more of a Metal:UNI ratio than proposed, and given how the chain has very minimal non-native TVL, we are in favor of waiting for this.
Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns (Snapshot)
We voted Allow UAC Surplus Spending: We think this makes sense given the timeliness of some incentive opportunities. Note, team members sit on the UAC and UEII.
Incentive Package for Sonic (Formerly Fantom) (Snapshot)
We voted $250k Incentive Match: Sonic, formerly Fantom, will be super exciting to watch over the next few months. We are excited to see Uniswap deployed on their chain upon launch and think the $500k match is reasonable and definitely worth coincentives.
Incentive Package for Sonic (On Chain)
We voted For: In line with above reasoning. Excited to see this get off the ground.
Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo (On Chain)
We voted For: In line with above reasoning. Looking forward to continuing the incentives.
Governance Proposal - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement (On Chain)
We voted For: Continued support from snapshot in line with prior vote.
Uniswap DAO Principles (On Chain)
We voted For: Continued support from snapshot in line with prior vote.
[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3 (Snapshot)
We voted Yes: While not perfect, we tried to make this the best of all the opinions expressed through conversations and on the forums for this upcoming cycle. At the end of the day, we think this is a reasonable increase in requirements to be part of the new active set of delegates and that the everything makes sense. Thanks to the rest of the team that spearheaded discussions and work to set this up.
[Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives (Snapshot)
We voted Yes: This proposal is pretty straight forward and we think the incentives for v4 and Unichain are going to be needed to see some kickstart in growth and adoption. Overall, team has delivered well in past and see no reason to doubt this time.
[Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed (Snapshot)
We voted Abstain: Overall, we’re in supportive of the proposal, but think that 1: This proposal snapshot is quite rushed and deserves some more time in RFC, and 2: A lot of the concerns we highlighted/heard highlighted to the team at UniDay Govswap event in Denver didn’t happen and concessions weren’t made, pretty much all regarding UF accountability to the DAO. Overall, we understand this is their choice and might not be a dealbreaker, but would be nice to see some edits before an on chain vote.
Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3 (On Chain)
We voted For: Voting in line with our snapshot support. As mentioned, we think this is a reasonable increase in requirements to be part of the new active set of delegates and that the everything makes sense.
[Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives (Snapshot)
We voted For $250k: This is a promising chain with no big contentions on the forums and follow up concerns. Wintermute brought up some good points that we think were addressed decently well. Overall, the sheer amount of incentives ($4.2m over the course of the 6 months), combined with their funding of Oku shows that they are very focused on Uniswap and these co-incentives makes sense.
Uniswap Unleashed (On Chain)
We voted For: After the temperature check vote, we were a little hesitant and had wished there were a few points that could be changed before the final vote. However, over the last few weeks, the UF has reached out many times and we appreciate their willingness to work with us and the UAC on many of the feedback we’ve given them. This will be a continuous process going forward and looking forward to incorporating as much feedback as we can from the commnity to the UF.
Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives (On Chain)
We voted For: As mentioned prior, we think this proposal is pretty straight forward and we think the incentives for v4 and Unichain are going to be needed to see the kickstart in growth and adoption.