Curia Delegate Platform

[Curia]

GLI — Incentivized Delegation Vaults
We are voting in favor of the Incentivized Delegation Vaults, as they directly activate dormant voting power and complement longer-term initiatives like UVN, consistent with the views we shared in the discussion thread.

@Curia

I strongly support this solution. IDVs directly incentivize delegators, targeting both:

• New UNI holders who have not delegated yet, and
• Existing delegators who are currently delegating to inactive or “ghost” delegates.

This strategy aligns well with the goal of activating dormant voting power. We are keen to contribute to the discussions on defining “active delegates” to ensure the program 's effectiveness similar to our works within Obol collective.

Regarding the concern from SeedGov that IDVs may overlap with UVN. I agree with @DonOfDAOS’s clarification. While UVN is promising, its timeline is uncertain and its impact is not guaranteed to fully address quorum issue. It may be prudent, therefore, to concurrently explore DAO-led solutions like IDVs. Such initiatives could serve as valuable complements to UVN, addressing any delegation gaps it might leave unaddressed, and could be phased out if UVN proves to be a comprehensive solution on its own.