Argonaut Delegate Platform

Delegation Pitch
22
23
  • Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We supported this proposal because Celo’s integration into the SuperChain can create strong synergies within the ecosystem, ultimately benefiting Uniswap.
24
  • Proposal: Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Allow UAC Surplus Spending
  • Reasoning: We supported this proposal because we believe utilizing the UAC’s surplus funds, generated from UNI price appreciation, can benefit the DAO and we believe it’s good to allow some flexibility, even if it comes at the cost of relying on discretionary actions that bypass governance.
25
  • Proposal: Incentive Package for Sonic (Formerly Fantom)
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: $250k Incentive Match
  • Reasoning: We supported this proposal because Sonic is a promising EVM-compatible Layer 1 and the successor to Fantom, a well-established Layer 1 with a strong team behind it. We believe that matching the $250k incentive is the best decision to ensure Uniswap gains an early advantage on this network and expands its market share.
26
  • Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Uniswap DAO Principles
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We supported this proposal because it established a set of principles for delegates that we consider valuable. The proposer also took community feedback into account to enhance the proposal.
27
  • Proposal: Incentive Package for Sonic
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Aligned with our previous votes on Snapshot regarding this proposal, we will vote in favor because Sonic is a promising EVM-compatible Layer 1 and the successor to Fantom, a well-established Layer 1 with a strong team behind it.
28
  • Proposal: Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We continue to support this proposal and will vote in favor because Celo’s integration into the SuperChain can generate significant synergies within the ecosystem, bringing long-term benefits to Uniswap.
29
  • Proposal: Uniswap DAO Principles
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Aligned with our previous votes on Snapshot regarding this proposal, we will vote in favor as we consider these principles valuable for delegates.
30
  • Proposal: Governance Proposal - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Aligned with our previous votes on Snapshot regarding this proposal, we will vote in favor as the SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement establishes a clear framework to protect whitehats, ensuring responsible actions during urgent exploits while aligning with industry-standard bounties.
31
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Yes
  • Reasoning: The authors of the proposal have carefully considered feedback from other delegates, incorporating some into the current version while evaluating the rest for the next cycle. We support the proposal as it improves on the previous cycle’s program and is well thought out.
32
  • Proposal: Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We maintain our stance and continue to support this program. All Cycles have shown great benefits for the protocol, so there is no reason to oppose it. We appreciate once again that all the feedback received has been taken into account.
33
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Yes
  • Reasoning: While $95 million is a significant request, the Uniswap Foundation has played a key role in the DAO’s development and continues to work on projects that add value. The main reason for supporting this proposal is that its failure could have harmful consequences for the DAO.
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We support this proposal because we believe incentives on Uniswap V4 are crucial for driving migration to the new version and boosting development using hooks. So far, UniV4’s metrics haven’t been strong, and we hope this will help turn that around. However, we still think the proposal’s structure was not ideal and should have been split into separate proposals.
34
  • Proposal: Uniswap Unleashed
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Aligned with our vote in Snapshot, the Uniswap Foundation has played a key role in the DAO’s development and continues to work on projects that add value. The main reason for supporting this proposal is that its failure could have harmful consequences for the DAO.
  • Proposal: Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Aligned with our vote in Snapshot, we support this proposal because we believe incentives on Uniswap V4 are crucial for driving migration to the new version and boosting development using hooks. So far, UniV4’s metrics haven’t been strong, and we hope this will help turn that around.
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Against
  • Reasoning: Consistent with similar proposals, we don’t believe Saga is a chain that justifies an incentives expense from the DAO. It’s still a young chain.
35
  • Proposal: [Temp Check] Treasury Delegation Round 2
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Against
  • Reasoning: While the original proposal was good, after the updates we disagreed with several points, such as the arbitrary limit of 12 delegates and knowing the selection methodology in advance, potentially allowing for deliberate exclusion of certain delegates by picking the limit of delegates to be included. Additionally, as stated in this forum post, we disagree with the methodology used to calculate the ranking of one participant for the DIP Cycle 3 criteria and scoring metrics, and this updated proposal intends to use the same method.
36
  • Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: For $375k
  • Reasoning: As we mentioned in our comment on the proposal here, we had a dilemma. However, after giving it further thought and reading some of the opinions shared by other delegates, we have decided to support this proposal. Our main reason is the promising growth this L2 has shown and how beneficial this initial boost could be.
37
  • Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process
  • Voting type & platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We’re voting in favor of this proposal because we think it helps make the v4 deployment process easier and faster. Giving UF the ability to deploy contracts makes sense and will help the DAO move more efficiently. It’s a good first step toward setting up a better process for future deployments.
38
  • Proposal: BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Our reasoning remains consistent with the stance we shared during the Snapshot vote. The strong growth potential of this L2 is a clear sign that supporting this vote is a great opportunity.
39
  • Proposal: Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process
  • Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: Our team maintains the position taken in the Snapshot vote by voting in favor. As we have mentioned before, we are pleased with this first step as it improves the process for future implementations.
40
  • Proposal: UAC Renewal S4
  • Platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: Renew UAC
  • Reasoning: We support this renewal as we did with Season 3. The UAC has proven to be essential to the DAO due to their duties, and their work must continue to add value as it has, so we reaffirm our confidence in them for another season.
41
  • Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain
  • Platform: Offchain - Snapshot
  • Vote: For
  • Reasoning: We’ve voted in favor of this proposal. We believe that the GFXLabs team is more than capable of handling what this proposal aims to do. They have been a part of V3 and are still a great partner for the DAO due to their past contributions that have added a lot of value. The budget is not even a concern to us, considering they have even handled a $1.6M grant in the past, and have produced results far beyond the original scope of that grant. So we see no reason to oppose this proposal and its goals. GFXLabs has proven to be a trustworthy partnership. We support this expansion beyond OKU chains to further increase Uniswap’s reach.