[Temp Check] Onboard Uniswap to Redstone
We voted Deploy without incentives: We are in favor of this deployment as with most and think that deployng without incentives for the time being is the best course of action being that the chain just launched and there is minimal traction.
We voted For: Similar to our reasoning prior, we are in favor of this proposal and the specified funding for the DEF.
Uniswap Delegate Reward- 3 Months Cycle 1
We voted For: Similar to our prior reasoning, we’re excited to see something get started and off the ground for delegates and will revisit in a couple of months.
Arbitrum LTIPP Incentive Matching
We voted: $1m to $250k in order, Do Not Fund last: Given the potential future collaborations with Arbitrum who has shown the ability and interest in funding projects, this is a great way to further increase our synergies. Uniswap is the top trusted and most active DEX on Arbitrum and there are a lot of advantages to us working together closer in the future.
We voted For: We voted for the on chain vote with the $750k option that won the snapshot, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
[Temp Check] Uniswap Onboarding Package - Gnosis Chain
We voted $250k: Gnosis has shown a relatively decent level of product market fit and we think there could be substantial improvements in TVL and activity on Uniswap with these incentives there. $250k is in line with DAO soft consensus and past rewards for similar chains.
Onboarding Package for Gnosis Chain
We voted For: We voted for the on chain vote, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap Onboarding Package - OKX Chain
Edit: We voted Abstain: After chatting with the OKX Chain team, they have decided to postpone this vote for incentives until they launch their liquidity mining incentives initiative, when they might be able to provide matching incentives.
[TEMP CHECK]- Revised - Uniswap Onboarding Package - OKX Chain
We voted For: In this revised vote, we think the DAO covering the cost of the OKU deployment is appropriate and we are in favor.
We voted For: We voted for the on chain vote, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
[Temp Check] Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program
We voted Arbitrum, Base: This proposal by StableLab is well timed and for a very reasonable price, will help determine the effectiveness of the Incentives so far allocated to those chains. These two chains are the top priority in our eyes and no matter the third, these two should definitely be considered.
[Temp Check] Activate 2, 3, 4 bps fee tiers on Uniswap v3 on Base
We vote Yes, activate additional tiers: We see no major issues with doing this and will allow Uniswap to be more competitive on Base, hopefully taking some market share back from aerodrome.
Edit: We have voted similarly in the revised version of this vote.
[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2
We vote Yes: Following the conclusion of the first cycle of delegate rewards, the increased participation from the candidates combined with more consistent communication was a great addition and something definitely worth revisiting.
Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2
We vote For: We voted for the on chain vote, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
[Temp Check] - Ethereum Foundation Attackathon Sponsorship
We voted Do Not Sponsor: This was a bit tricky but our ultimate decision came down to the seemingly lack or strong support in the forums and a hard time figuring out the direct benefit to Uniswap. We’ve seen this proposal around in other DAOs and it seems like some have sponsored and help while others haven’t.
Proposal to active 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base
We voted For: In line with our prior reasoning, and after confirmation that the code is genuine, we are in support.