L2BEAT Delegate Platform

[Snapshot] Treasury Delegation Round 2 Elections - Voted FOR Tane, SEED, Event Horizon and, KPK

As we explained in our previous rationale, we do not believe repeated rounds of treasury delegations are the right path for Uniswap governance. The first round has already committed 10M UNI, and continuing this model risks setting a precedent where treasury assets are routinely used to address quorum challenges without tackling the root causes of limited participation.

However, since this second round of treasury delegation has already passed, we engaged with the process and voted for the candidates we consider to be capable of responsibly using this delegated voting power. Our choices—Tane, SEED, and KPK—reflect teams with strong track records in governance and active contributions to the ecosystem.

At the same time, we want to make it clear that our participation should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the treasury delegation model itself. We remain cautious about this approach and encourage the DAO to reflect on whether repeating these rounds reinforces or undermines the long-term sustainability of governance.

2 Likes

[Snapshot] Uniswap Community Proposal Factory - Voted AGAINST

We decided to vote against. We appreciate the intent to lower barriers and encourage broader participation, but we felt the core challenge is social and organizational rather than purely technical. Delegating twenty million UNI without clearer ownership, operating rules, and reporting felt premature, especially since large delegates can already help sponsor proposals today. We would be open to revisiting a smaller, time-boxed pilot under Uniswap Foundation custody with a simple public policy for how votes are used and clear metrics on participation quality.