Voting Actions - November 3rd - 7th
Proposal: Uniswap Community Proposal Factory
Vote: Against
Reasoning: We do not support this proposal in the current state, and the reasoning can be found here.
Proposal: Uniswap Community Proposal Factory
Vote: Against
Reasoning: We do not support this proposal in the current state, and the reasoning can be found here.
Proposal: UNIfication
Vote: For
Reasoning: This proposal is a step forward for long-term alignment across the Uniswap ecosystem. Turning on protocol fees and introducing a unified, programmatic UNI burn mechanism creates a direct link between protocol usage and tokenholder value, while still protecting LP incentives through a phased rollout and MEV-internalising improvements like the PFDA.
The broader unification of Labs + Foundation under a single growth mandate also strengthens execution: removing interface fees, consolidating ecosystem support, and funding protocol-first development through a transparent, budgeted framework aligns all teams behind one flywheel. Combined with the retroactive burn, Unichain sequencer fee redirection, and the expansion of hook-based aggregation, the proposal sets up Uniswap to scale as the default venue for onchain liquidity.
Proposal: Strategic Renewal of Gnosis, Linea, and Mantle Deployments
Vote: For
Reasoning: Weâre in favor of renewing these deployments. The three chains still represent valuable user bases and active ecosystems, and the maintenance cost is aligned with historical spending. Preserving Uniswapâs position while pruning underperforming networks is a sound approach.
Proposal: UNIfication
Vote: For
Reasoning: We voted for on the temp check (snapshot) and the reasoning remains the same.
Proposal: Strategic Renewal of Gnosis, Linea, and Mantle Deployments
Vote: For
Reasoning: We voted for on the temp check (snapshot) and the reasoning remains the same.