Voting Actions December 2nd - 6th
Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Uniswap DAO Principles
Vote: For
Reasoning: We are in favour of having collective principles for Uniswap DAO as they ensure a respectful, fair and encouraging ecosystem for all.
1 Like
Voting Actions January 6th - 10th
Proposal: Incentive Package for Sonic
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, we voted in favour.
Proposal: Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, we voted in favour.
Voting Actions January 13th - 17th
Proposal: Uniswap DAO Principles
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, we voted in favour.
Proposal: Governance Proposal - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, we voted in favour.
Voting Actions February 17th - 21st
Proposal: [Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: We believe the Delegate Reward Initiative is effectively contributing to active participation in the DAO. For this reason, we voted in favour.
Voting Actions February 24th - 28th
Proposal: [Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed
Vote: For
Reasoning: Although we recognise this funding proposal requests a significant amount, we believe the Uniswap Foundation is a core contributor to the Uniswap DAO, contributing positively and effectively to the ecosystem and DAO growth. For this reason, we voted in favour of the proposal.
We strongly encourage the UF to continue sharing transparent reports on their use of funds and funded initiatives.
Proposal: [Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives
Vote: For
Reasoning: Considering the growing competition in the DEX market, we recognise the need to take a strong approach for the initial growth of Uniswap v4 and Unichain. Although this proposal requires a significant amount of UNI, we are confident that the Uniswap Foundation and Gauntlet proposed an incentives strategy based on data analysis and performance optimisations with a long-term view. For this reason, we voted in favour.
Proposal: Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, given its success in its previous cycles.
Voting Actions March 17th - 21st
Proposal: [Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives
Vote: Against
Reasoning: Weâre supportive of expanding Uniswap across multiple chains. However, we believe incentives should be deployed carefully. Ideally, weâd like to see the learnings from previous incentive campaigns (e.g., analytics on best and worst performing pools from the latest Forse Analytics update) applied to future campaigns.
Proposal: Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, we voted in favour.
Proposal: Uniswap Unleashed
Vote: For
Reasoning: Continuing our support for this initiative, we voted in favour.
Voting Actions March 31st - April 4th
Proposal: [Temp Check] Treasury Delegation Round 2
Vote: For
Reasoning: In light of the positive impact of this initiative in its first iteration, we support its renewal for a second round.
Voting Actions April 14th - 18th
Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package
Vote: For $375k
Reasoning: We support the deployment of Uniswap v3 across multiple chains and believe BoB is an interesting opportunity to approach the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process
Vote: For
Reasoning: We agree we should consider the BUSL licence a competitive advantage for Uniswap. We support granting a blanket exemption to the Uniswap Foundation as we believe thatâs an effective way forward to deploy Uniswap v4 on promising chains.
Voting Actions April 28th - May 2nd
Proposal: Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We are voting to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Proposal: UAC Renewal S4
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We are voting to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Proposal: Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We are voting to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Proposal: [Temp Check/Revised] Treasury Delegation Round 2
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We are voting to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We are voting to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Proposal: BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package
Vote: For
Reasoning: Weâre supportive of exploring the Bitcoin market through incentives on BOB.
Voting Actions May 5th - 9th
Proposal: [Temp Check] Analytics Hub for Uniswapâs Revitalization and Growth Program
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: Weâre generally supportive of Forse as a tool and are satisfied with the results of its initial analysis. However, with the exception of Unichain, we are unsure of the utility of an in-depth analysis of the proposed chains due to their low popularity or less successful campaigns. For this reason, we voted to abstain.
Proposal: Four Chains for Analytics Hub for Uniswapâs Revitalization and Growth Program
Vote: Unichain, Linea, Zksync, Polygon zkEVM
Reasoning: Should additional analysis over the growth program be approved, we believe these to be the most useful chains and campaigns to analyse. Unichain is interesting because of the key relevance to the Uniswap ecosystem and a unique incentive program approved, which is different from the one conducted by the Growth Program. The others are interesting because of their less successful campaign outcomes, contrasting expectations based on their popularity.
Proposal: UAC Renewal S4
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We voted to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Proposal: Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We voted to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Voting Actions May 12th - 16th
Proposal: Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain
Vote: Abstain
Reasoning: We are in favour of the proposal as we believe having Uniswap v4 and Unichain integrated in independent frontends is critical for the growth of the ecosystem and Oku is very well positioned to provide this service. However, we voted to abstain to avoid conflicts of interest.
Voting Actions May 18th - 23rd
Proposal: Uniswap Accountability Committee S4 Elections
Vote: Equal split among all candidates
Reasoning: We decided to abstain from the vote to avoid conflicts of interest. As no âabstainâ option was available, we equally split our vote among all candidates.
Voting Actions June 2nd - 6th
Proposal: Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain
Vote: For
Reasoning: Having Uniswap v4 and Unichain integrated in frontends independent from Uniswap Labs is critical for accessibility, and Oku is very well positioned to provide this service. For these reasons, we voted in favour.
1 Like
Voting Actions June 16th - 20th
Proposal: Trial run a Technical Advisory Board (TAB)
Vote: Against
Reasoning: Increasing the technical awareness of the larger delegate cohort is a fundamental and valuable goal. However, we have some reservations about the proposed TABâs current scope and structure. Considering the limited current workload, thereâs a risk that a formal, multi-member board might introduce more overhead than value at this stage. For this reason, we voted against the proposal in its current format.
Proposal: Uniswap Unichain - USDS and sUSDS Co-Incentives Growth Management Plan
Vote: For
Reasoning: Unichain is focused on DeFi and financial use-cases. Given Skyâs strong positioning, we believe it to be a prime partner for Uniswap in growing its stablecoin market on Unichain. For this reason, we voted in favour.