Trial run a Technical Advisory Board (TAB)
We voted against this proposal as we believe it doesn’t make sense under the proposed scope. While we agree that it could be beneficial for the DAO to have more technical experts and developers amongst the delegate set and similar to improve discussions and decision making, the current lack of such proposals (as highlighted by @AbdullahUmar here) does not in our mind justify having a pretty costly committee on the payroll. This could probably be easier solved on an ad hoc basis for now. As many others, we also have reservations around doing more treasury delegations unless the value add is super clear. Having said that, we do think that Uniswap should always strive to improve incentive alignment and give builders more of a say in governance.