Voting Updates
[Temp Check] - Ethereum Foundation Attackathon Sponsorship
Voted don’t sponsor
-Considering Uniswap Foundation themselves sponsor or host many of the Hackathons and already contributing to several public goods, we are concerned that this effort is a duplicate effort.
Also, considering Ethereum Foundation has been accused of not allocating enough funding for DeFi objective, we believe ironically that EF requesting funding rather than paying from their own budget seem to make the case even more clear.
We are voting strongly in against.
1 Like
Voting Updates
Proposal to active 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base
Voted No
-We have voted against for now as we aren’t sure about full implications of such changes
Voting Updates
Uniswap Delegate Race Tiebreaker
Voted 1st Tane 2nd Agronaut 3rd Both
-Believe it’s better to choose one than expanding the budget scope
Approved Budgets Rebalancing
Voted Approved Rebalance
-In the long term, the budgets might be able to provide in stablecoin to counter the volatile nature of Uni token but for now, this is the best way to proceed
UAC Renewal S3
Voted Renew UAC
-Considering UAC has done a lot to support the Uniswap ecosystem, we support the renewal
Voting Updates
Uniswap Accountability S3 Renewal and Rebalance
Voted Yes
While not ideal, believe it’s important to ensure to balance the fall in the budget due to fall in UNI price
Voting Updates
Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program
Voted Yes
We believe Forse can help to share more insights into incentive programs running in Uniswap.
Voting Updates
Uniswap Accountability Committee S3 Elections
25% each to Jojo, Alicecorsini, Alex Duckworth, and Sov
-Jojo, Alice, and Alex have been contributing to Uniswap governance as well as various working groups. For Sov, while he hasn’t directly involved in Uniswap governance, believe that his expertise especially in DAO org and public good can be helpful.
Edit: I don’t mind losing but losing because while others voted 50% toward themselves while I didn’t. But do believe there are many good candidates. So changing to 25% to myself and 25% to Alex, 25% to Jojo, and 25% to Alice.
1 Like
Voting Updates
[TEMP CHECK] - Onboarding Package for Lisk
Voted Yes
-Considering Lisk team themselves are promising for matching certain liquidity, do believe it’s worthy to try
1 Like
Voting Updates
Uniswap Growth Program Trial
Voted Yes
-We do believe having a marketing initiative can be helpful as long as it has clear kpis and goals. In addition, we do recognize Alpha Growth is competent with good business focus.
1 Like
Voting Updates
Uniswap Growth Program Trial
Voted Yes
-While it is a big budget, we do believe Alpha Growth has shown that it is able to secure good interest and budgets for defi protocols. As it goes to Uniswap Accountability Committee first, it will act to help ensuring the work is more likely to be delivered
[Updated] Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program
Voted Yes
-It’s an updated vote reflecting former feedback such as supporting 4 blockchain and still at reduced budget. We do believe having such will be beneficial for Uniswap DAO as it is expanding its multichain aspects.
Voting Updates
[TEMP CHECK] - Tally Uniswap Proposal
Voted Yes
-We believe this proposal is overdue as Tally has been a important governance infrastructure Uniswap governance relies on and yet does not get as much support as it should. As a delegate myself, Tally has been easier to use as well as more responsive to feedback.
Tally in our perspective is a public good that directly benefits Uniswap and with this proposal, believe that there can be more collaboration and focus on supporting uniswap governance from Tally side.
Voting Updates
Supporting Tally’s Development and Enhancements for Uniswap DAO Governance
Voted Yes
-Once again, We believe this proposal is overdue as Tally has been a important governance infrastructure Uniswap governance relies on and yet does not get as much support as it should. As a delegate myself, Tally has been easier to use as well as more responsive to feedback.
Tally in our perspective is a public good that directly benefits Uniswap and with this proposal, believe that there can be more collaboration and focus on supporting uniswap governance from Tally side.
Voting Updates
[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap DAO Principles
Voted Yes
-As Uniswap Delegate program grows, we believe having such principles would be important
Voting Updates
[Temp Check] - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement
Voted Yes
-Considering the cost occurs in case of if they find the bugs, find it to be non issue to proceed
[TEMP CHECK] Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo
Voted Yes
-Uniswap on Celo has been growing and believe joint incentives will be beneficial.
[TEMP CHECK] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3
Voted Yes
-We generally been supportive of incentive that are joint to grow L2s. Cautious on few points including incentive to metal usd but believe it could be beneficial
Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns
Voted Yes
-We believe such would be helpful to allow more flexibility into how incentives can be negotiated
Incentive Package for Sonic (Formerly Fantom)
Voted Yes
-We generally been supportive of incentive that are joint to grow L2s. As long as Sonic team follows through the commitment, it seems like it can be beneficial.
Voting Updates
Incentive Package for Sonic
Voted Yes
-We will have to see whether they actually follow through with providing incentives but assuming they do, it can be beneficial to grow the ecosystem
Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo
Voted Yes
-As Celo themselves are allocating generous amount, we believe the program can be beneficial to grow the ecosystem
Voting Updates
Governance Proposal - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement
Voted Yes
-While of course, ideally, Uniswap not getting attacked is the best case but in case of such attacks, the agreement can help to safeguard Uniswap even further.
Uniswap DAO Principles
Voted Yes
-Some of the principles if enforced might need revisions but do agree that the overall ideas make sense
Voting updates
Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3
Voted Yes
-We are happy to implement several improvements including having more clear tie breakers and rationale date deadlines
Voting updates
Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3 (Onchain)
Voted Yes
-We are happy to implement several improvements including having more clear tie breakers and rationale date deadlines. There are many changes that are happening with Uniswap ecosystem and active delegates will be more important than even before
Voting updates
[Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives
Voted Yes
-While there are aspects of the proposal that could be refined, we believe it presents a solid foundation for enhancing the Uniswap ecosystem. Therefore, we support the proposal at this time, recognizing the importance of ongoing evaluation and adaptation to maximize its effectiveness.
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-uniswap-unleashed-unichain-and-uniswap-v4-liquidity-incentives/25250/32?u=doo_stablelab
Voting updates
[Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed
Voted Abstain
-We strongly recommend the Uniswap Foundation to reconsider how it wants to move forward with grants. One approach could be for the Foundation to present a monthly or quarterly list of grants for DAO approval, with comments explaining the recommendations. Alternatively, a more narrow list and budget for grants might be considered. Traditionally, Uniswap Governance utilizes Snapshot (offchain voting) for sentiment, allowing onchain proposals to incorporate more details or edits as needed. We voted to abstain at this time, anticipating that the outlined concerns will be addressed in future iterations. https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-uniswap-unleashed/25251/41?u=doo_stablelab
Voting updates
[Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives
Voted Abstain
-While we have been generally supportive of incentive plans, especially with the large upcoming Unichain incentives, we want to be more careful on providing incentive to other chains especially smaller chains