Jojo Delegate Platform

[_JoJo]

[Tally] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3
Voted in favor, confirming the rationale of the previous snapshot vote.

[Snapshot] [Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed
The platform didn’t register my vote, likely for the issue with safe (i vote through a safe). My bad. Anyhow, i want to currently abstain from this initiative. I think that the discussion currently in quite healthy. I personally support the stand of Doo here:

@Doo_StableLab

-The grants budget, which is more than double the budget for Operations, is contentious due to the budget size and question regarding its impacts. While we appreciate the report, such as this, aside from grants spent on audits, which are understandably important, it’s difficult to see actual impacts. For example, the report noted over 400+ new hook developers, which is great, but how much TVL and revenue will they generate? A big portion of the grants are ongoing, we don’t necessarily believe that it would be beneficial to create more burdens for the Foundation team with larger grants to manage. This is also considering there are already large grants specifically for Unichain and V4 migration (which we suggest just incentivizing v4 onboarding to Unichain.)

The operational budget is big but not huge for the size of this protocol. What I see as a problem in having a grant budget being this size tho, with several initiatives on going. We should find a way to have a degree of transparency and scrutiny that is strong enough to justify a budget that can, indeed, be a weapon for the foundation to grow uniswap market share.

[Snapshot] [Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives
I voted abstain. I agree with the delegates who are pushing for separating the two votes, I think it would be quite sensitive to do so, so we can analyse and vote on the single matters separately (both have a merit by the way).