Create the Uniswap Foundation
We voted FOR: Looking forward to the finalization of this proposal and the start of something great for Uniswap!
1 Like
Should we deploy Uniswap v3 on Aurora?
We voted YES: As part of Uniswap’s multichain vision, we believe Aurora is a great and logical next step. As a rapidly increasing blockchain, that’s lets users easily onboard onto the nonEVM Near chain, Aurora is a nice connector between the EVM world Uniswap users are used to and newer and possibly more innovative nonEVM chains.
2 Likes
Deploy Uniswap V3 to zkSync
We voted YES: Worked together with zkSync to get this proposal out there. Temperature check now live here: Deploy Uniswap V3 to zkSync Looking forward to the RFC period the next few days!
Voted YES: Voted Yes to the consensus check as well.
Voted YES: Voted Yes to the on-chain vote as well.
Would it be better? Faster and smoother? We’er looking forward to it.
Optimism-Uniswap Protocol LM Program: Structure
We voted 3 Phases [50k/2w, 100k/3w, 650k]: We think the slightly tiered decrease in emissions for next 3 weeks is appropriate once liquidity has been provided, users’ TVL are sticky and less likely to move out. The final analysis before deploying the 650k rest is also appropriate.
Optimism-Uniswap Protocol LM Program: Pool selection
We voted WETH/USDC, WETH/DAI, USDC/DAI: The reason why we chose to add DAI/USDC as opposed to nothing or OP was because this stablecoin pair won’t need that much incentives to drive millions of dollars of liquidity to enter the pool. For example, users would be find taking for example 5% extra on a stable LP but would require 15% extra for a volatile pool, therefore, for the same amount of LM rewards, the stable pair could attract 3x as much liquidity.
Deploy Uniswap V3 to Boba Network
We voted YES: Worked together with zkSync to get this proposal out there.
Temperature Check passed with 15M votes
Consensus Check voted Yes
Temperature Check: Deploy Uniswap v3 on Scroll
We voted NO: Voting no for now as we’ve made attempts to talk with the Scroll team and no response yet. So voting no until we get some more clarity as many of the comments rolling through on the forums still are/have been suspicious and the team has done nothing to interacting with delegates that we know of. Not many of key Uniswap players seem to care right now and no real comments on the forums, so we think it is better tabled now until we get more clarity and communication.
Hi there, thanks so much for taking the time to read through our proposal. We regret that our proposal drew so many spam comments to the forum which should be a place for constructive discussion. We have been in close contact with the Uniswap Foundation to resolve this. This is the first time this happened to us and we are taking notes to avoid this in the future where we can.
We chose to post the Temperature Check for a testnet deployment in order to be in close contact with the Uniswap community from the start and be able to make sure everything is running smoothly before considering a deployment on mainnet. We take your feedback seriously and would love to get the chance to chat.
Thanks for the follow up here! Appreciate you taking steps to sort out the comment spam.
In the direction message you sent to us in paralle to this forum post, you mentioned “Next to the Uniswap Foundation we have been in touch with many delegates ahead of time including Gauntlet, She256, Blockchain at Berkley, etc. All of which have signalled support once we are ready to start the governance process for mainnet.” We are in touch with all of these delegates as well and would love to chat. I believe Kydo from llama/stanford has set up a chat has been set up with us and Berkeley. We are waiting for someone from Scroll to join and answer some of the questions we all have.
2 Likes
Hey can you loop me in here too? Feels like a bit of a departure and just want to make sure I’m getting the whole story.
Hey @eek637 Shoot us a DM! We had a call with the Scroll team, got a lot more background on everything and learned about the team. Happy to answer any questions we can.
Thanks! scroll noticed me complaining and reached out as well, chatting with them tomorrow.
1 Like
Community Governance Process Changes
We voted YES: We are a huge fan of the new updates to the Temperature Check and Consensus Check logistics. We recently concluded a governance deep dive research piece for the UF and this will be one of the main things many people said they wanted to improve!
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/a-deep-dive-of-uniswaps-governance/19792
Just wanted to highlight here our recent research we did this semester regarding Uniswap’s governance!
Deploy Uniswap V3 to Boba Network
We voted YES: Voting yes our general opinions regarding v3 being made available to as many good chains as possible holds here. We worked with the team to help them submit this proposal through the formal governance process and thank them for all their help.
UPDATED: Voting yes on the new proposal after a change in the legal recipient of the additional use grant
[RFC - Update] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on BNB Chain (Binance) Bridging Solution
We voted ABSTAIN: Our first Abstain vote in a while, reasoning in posts here:
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1-0-3-0-05-0-01-on-bnb-chain-binance/19734/64?u=pennblockchain
https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1-0-3-0-05-0-01-on-bnb-chain-binance/19734/81?u=pennblockchain
Voted YES: To the on chain vote. Seeing a great level of turnout and debate, as w the community has chosen Wormhole, we believe it is appropriate to move forward with Wormhole on this proposal.
1 Like
Enable 1bp Fee Tier for UniswapV3 on Arbitrum
We voted YES: Nice simple yes vote here as it’s logical and follows prior chains.
Deploy Uniswap V3 on Avalanche
We voted FOR: Voted for on both temperature check and on chain vote. Our reasoning for this was a bit debated internally, but at the end of the day, we believe Uniswap should 100% deploy onto Avalanche. We wish discussions surrounding the bridging provider were answered in the forums, however, completely understand the forum fatigue there and general community unwillingness to replicate the BNB discussion. As prior mentioned, we don’t believe a precedence should/was set and are looking forward to a competitive bridging landscape in the future with respect to providers for Uniswap deployments.
1 Like
Announcement to the Uniswap community from the governance team at FranklinDAO.
As part of an effort to strengthen our internal organization and operational security, we’re migrating our delegate profile (franklindao.eth) to a hard wallet at 0xCc878369b26127BD4bC1B0B465bC8bE9b92a4c62.
Our old address (0x070341aA5Ed571f0FB2c4a5641409B1A46b4961b) will remain active in protocol governance for the next month until June 15, 2023, so as to give everyone ample time to re-delegate their tokens.
We appreciate all of the holders that have entrusted us with their voting power and look forward to meaningfully improving the projects we all use on your behalf.
We are always accessible via the forums or Twitter @franklin_dao for any questions!
1 Like