Thanks! scroll noticed me complaining and reached out as well, chatting with them tomorrow.
Community Governance Process Changes
We voted YES: We are a huge fan of the new updates to the Temperature Check and Consensus Check logistics. We recently concluded a governance deep dive research piece for the UF and this will be one of the main things many people said they wanted to improve!
Just wanted to highlight here our recent research we did this semester regarding Uniswap’s governance!
Deploy Uniswap V3 to Boba Network
We voted YES: Voting yes our general opinions regarding v3 being made available to as many good chains as possible holds here. We worked with the team to help them submit this proposal through the formal governance process and thank them for all their help.
UPDATED: Voting yes on the new proposal after a change in the legal recipient of the additional use grant
[RFC - Update] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on BNB Chain (Binance) Bridging Solution
We voted ABSTAIN: Our first Abstain vote in a while, reasoning in posts here:
Voted YES: To the on chain vote. Seeing a great level of turnout and debate, as w the community has chosen Wormhole, we believe it is appropriate to move forward with Wormhole on this proposal.
Enable 1bp Fee Tier for UniswapV3 on Arbitrum
We voted YES: Nice simple yes vote here as it’s logical and follows prior chains.
Deploy Uniswap V3 on Avalanche
We voted FOR: Voted for on both temperature check and on chain vote. Our reasoning for this was a bit debated internally, but at the end of the day, we believe Uniswap should 100% deploy onto Avalanche. We wish discussions surrounding the bridging provider were answered in the forums, however, completely understand the forum fatigue there and general community unwillingness to replicate the BNB discussion. As prior mentioned, we don’t believe a precedence should/was set and are looking forward to a competitive bridging landscape in the future with respect to providers for Uniswap deployments.