FranklinDAO (Prev. Penn Blockchain) Delegate Platform

[eek637]

Thanks! scroll noticed me complaining and reached out as well, chatting with them tomorrow.

[pennblockchain]

Community Governance Process Changes

We voted YES: We are a huge fan of the new updates to the Temperature Check and Consensus Check logistics. We recently concluded a governance deep dive research piece for the UF and this will be one of the main things many people said they wanted to improve!

[pennblockchain]

A Deep Dive of Uniswap's Governance

Introduction Hello everyone, we are FranklinDAO, the recently rebranded Penn Blockchain team. Over the last couple of months, we interviewed stakeholders in the Uniswap ecosystem to investigate the current state of the governance process, highlighting triumphs, concerns, and areas of improvement. In this report, we’d like to give an overview of our research and highlight wins and pain points felt by members around the community. This will be closely followed by a separate post detailing specif…

Just wanted to highlight here our recent research we did this semester regarding Uniswap’s governance!

[pennblockchain]

Deploy Uniswap V3 to Boba Network

We voted YES: Voting yes our general opinions regarding v3 being made available to as many good chains as possible holds here. We worked with the team to help them submit this proposal through the formal governance process and thank them for all their help.

UPDATED: Voting yes on the new proposal after a change in the legal recipient of the additional use grant

[pennblockchain]

[RFC - Update] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on BNB Chain (Binance) Bridging Solution

We voted ABSTAIN: Our first Abstain vote in a while, reasoning in posts here:

[RFC - Update] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on BNB Chain (Binance)

Throwing in some comments here. We’ll preface by saying that considering how “unexpected” this discussion arose, we appreciate the UF team for their quick thinking and on the feet decisions. When looking at the main debate surrounding L0 and Wormhole, we’re still internally conflicted on which is ultimately the best, and think each has benefits of their own. Ultimately, we don’t think this proposed structure of finding a bridge partner is ideal and sets a bad precedence. We propose: A working…

[RFC - Update] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on BNB Chain (Binance)

This will be our (FranklinDAO/Penn) last post here seeing the impending 3 hour deadline for votes. Since we last posted here a few hours ago where we expressed our opinions regarding how we believe future bridging solutions should go, we are currently abstaining from a vote. For some background, this has certainly been the #1 most lobbied vote on Uniswap that we have ever partaken in. Our opinions expressed above should be coupled with this thought: no matter the outcome, this should be a short…

[pennblockchain]

Voted YES: To the on chain vote. Seeing a great level of turnout and debate, as w the community has chosen Wormhole, we believe it is appropriate to move forward with Wormhole on this proposal.

[pennblockchain]

Enable 1bp Fee Tier for UniswapV3 on Arbitrum

We voted YES: Nice simple yes vote here as it’s logical and follows prior chains.

[pennblockchain]

Deploy Uniswap V3 on Avalanche

We voted FOR: Voted for on both temperature check and on chain vote. Our reasoning for this was a bit debated internally, but at the end of the day, we believe Uniswap should 100% deploy onto Avalanche. We wish discussions surrounding the bridging provider were answered in the forums, however, completely understand the forum fatigue there and general community unwillingness to replicate the BNB discussion. As prior mentioned, we don’t believe a precedence should/was set and are looking forward to a competitive bridging landscape in the future with respect to providers for Uniswap deployments.