Atiselsts.eth Delegate Platform

Delegation Pitch
21

Onchain

  1. Uniswap Unleashed

    Vote: Against. Same rationale as for the snapshot vote.

    To be clear, I will continue to support the UF and the DAO regardless of the outcome, even if I disagree with the proposed resource allocation: Disagree and commit.

  2. Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives

    Vote: Abstain. Upon reflection, I changed my “Against” vote in the snapshot to “Abstain” in the on-chain vote. While I believe it is important to provide liquidity incentives for the v3 to v4 migration, I do not want my vote to be interpreted as opposition to that effort.

    That said, I want to reiterate that supporting Unichain incentives at this stage is premature. While Unichain has strong potential, the DAO should first establish some level of governance control over Unichain, including its fee switch. Additionally, incentives should be conditional on Labs delivering the promised technical innovations in Unichain, specifically:

    • Flashblocks
    • UVN with fees captured by UNI stakers
    • Cross-chain swaps utilizing Unichain’s liquidity

Snapshot

  1. [Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives

    Vote: Against. The liquidity incentive program has now been running for a year, and the evidence conclusively shows that providing incentives to low-TVL chains has been ineffective. As a result, I will vote against all such incentives going forward unless a compelling, exceptional case is made for the chain.

    While the Saga architecture is interesting, it does not currently meet the threshold for an exceptional case.

  2. [Temp Check] Treasury Delegation Round 2

    Vote: For. Strong support. We clearly need the treasury delegation program to continue to reach quorum on votes. Furthermore, this is a solid proposal that improves the existing program in several ways (notably with automatically expiring delegations), is clear and comprehensive. I’m also happy to see that agreement to the Uniswap DAO Principles has been added as a requirement.

2 Likes
22

April Votes

Snapshot

  1. [TEMP CHECK] BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package
    Vote: For $375k.

Previously I stated that I’d support v3 / multichain incentives in exceptional cases. BOB hits the checklist nicely, and therefore is such a case:

  • Relatively solid total chain TVL
  • Strong buy-in from the chain, prioritizing Uniswap as the top DEX on the chain.
  • Solid existing Uniswap TVL and fee revenue, relative to the chain’s TVL.
  • Last but not least, more than matching Uniswap’s incentives with their own, part of which is already distributed.

It’s slightly disappointing that they did not go straight for v4, but since their v3 deployment has already been active for some time, forcing them to switch to v4 would create unnecessary friction.

  1. [TEMP CHECK] Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process
    Vote: For.

This proposal will streamline v4 deployments, while keeping the risks minimal.