Hey folks — as described in this thread, we are now proceeding to the 48 hour Application Period for projects who’d like their users to be included in the retroactive airdrop for users affected by the proxy contract omission. As a reminder, these are the criteria for inclusion:
Inclusion Criteria
We define “projects” as being any entity whose users were excluded from the retroactive UNI allocation due to the proxy contract issue identified above.
In order to be eligible for inclusion in this distribution, a “project” must meet the following criteria:
Prior to September 1st, they exposed a publicly-available user interface either on web or in an integrated mobile application that allowed users to make trades on Uniswap in some capacity. We include DEX aggregators in this definition — UNI holders ultimately get their paycheck from market takers, not makers. Aggregators are fundamentally in the interest of Uniswap’s success.
It must be clearly verifiable that said interface / application was available to users prior to September 1st (e.g. if this is not immediately obvious that this is the case, the burden of proof is on the project for demonstrating, for instance, that an interface can be loaded on Wayback Machine, etc.)
It must be clearly verifiable that said interface / application at the time hooked into a proxy contract calling into Uniswap. Again — if this is not immediately obvious or verifiable, the burden of proof is on the project to demonstrate this.
Finally, the project should provide a list of addresses of affected users. It must be clearly verifiable that those addresses are associated with the proxy contract system previously identified to be associated with the project . Once again, if this is not immediately obvious, the burden of proof lays with the project.
All provided addresses will be verified against historical Uniswap v1 and v2 calls to exclude any addresses that were not in the call-chain of a Uniswap transaction (successful or failed). Open-source code to verify that this is indeed the case will be published for independent review. All addresses will be verified for not having been in the initial retroactive UNI allocation.
Application Template
What is the name of your project?
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
Please submit your applications within the next 48 hours — we will attempt to approve / request clarification in an expedient manner over the weekend. No need to over-invest in these applications — the burden of proof is directly proportional to the scale of users affected.
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
The following our four Uniswap wrapper contracts through which user initiated actions were routed:
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
≈600 - 850 users
We’ll be following up with the exact number later today.
Note that this recommendation is for Projects and Applications rather than for individual users. I don’t think you need to individually answer this topic. Maybe if you contact AMPL or Mooniswap via Twitter or another channel, they will be aware of this proposal.
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkel root.
~ 3000 users
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
~400
Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
Perhaps it might make sense to bundle this into Paraswap’s application? Can someone make contact with their team and make sure they submit an application before EOD tomorrow?
Could you please provide more color here? Are you a representative of the Aragon team? Or a user affected by the proxy contract omission? If one of Aragon’s products is affected by this omission, I’d ask that a member of their team submit an application on behalf of all users.
Thanks for submitting! To clarify, is the proxy contract you listed simply that used by DEX.AG? If so, would it make more sense for DEX.AG to submit an application and for their users to be considered a super-set of your affected users?
yea we use a copy of the DEX.AG contract, so the actual contract used by dex.ag is different from ours.
I will also let DEX.AG team know to submit a separate application.
I am a user affected by the proxy contract omission .I could not find who to contact with the kyber network team and the aragon team I could send an e-mail. I just don’t know who will help me
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
As well previous contract versions
0xf92c1ad75005e6436b4ee84e88cb23ed8a290988
0x6b158039b9678b7452f311deb12dd08c579dad26
0x72338b82800400f5488eca2b5a37270ba3b7a111
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.