Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
-Uniswap v2
Removed the liquidity for a problem with other exchanges, now is not possible add liquidity because not shows.
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
≈25000
It is difficult to estimate the exact number of users, but the 1inch smart contracts have always sent a large amount of volume through Uniswap.
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed:
Link to V2 Dex trades:
Link to V1 Dex trades:
" "/dextracker?filter=28&q=LMY
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
If I understand correctly from the information you’ve provided, your project’s users interacted with Uniswap directly and not through a proxy contract. As such, I don’t see how it would be appropriate to include AGVC in this proposal’s scope.
@deelbeone Many of the contract addresses you’ve listed are unverified contracts on Etherscan with negligible activity on them. Can you please focus your submission to the primary Totle contracts — specifically ones that are verified and had active usage routed through them?
Listed are quite a few more than “four Uniswap wrapper contracts”. For sake of clarity, can you please label the contracts and their purpose (see 0x’s submission for example)? One, for instance, appears to be related to filling 0x orders (which, I assume, would not be relevant to this).
This will come handy when we later want to pull together the set of affected addresses and verify them!
Abuse? What an assumption versus a simple misunderstanding. We can’t speak for Agave but if Lunch Money misunderstood the guidelines. Our ineligibilty is quite clear.
Projects — please submit your application by 9PM PST tonight
The current list of eligible projects that have submitted applications are Dharma, DeFi Saver, Paraswap (should encompass Monolith users), Nuo, 0x API, MyEtherWallet, Totle (Clarification requested here @deelbeone), Eidoo, 1inch.exchange (clarification requested here @deacix)
Later tonight, I will publish instructions on how projects should submit addresses of affected users, as well as code for demonstrating how said addresses were pulled. We will allot another 48 hours for projects to pull these together, and will aim to submit a proposal before the end of this week.
Note that the earliest users will receive their UNI is October 17th, so there is a higher premium on rigor & transparency than speed in getting this proposal submitted.
All primaries that have had meaningful usage:
0x7113dd99c79aff93d54cfa4b2885576535a132de
0x3179e4cd7ff08eb14397e1c402d0de44e1523f2e
0x3b21d6d25e7f036c8277efe9a7ebf17ca12fe4f6
0x77208a6000691e440026bed1b178ef4661d37426
0xc755af998e8c50d6df1779ce3d7e4084a17b4c56
It seems I am no longer able to edit the original post, so I would like to follow up here with the updated, more precise number:
We provided more context to this number in this reply to the original discussion thread. We have the exact list of account addresses and the full transaction history ready, but would still like to hear any potential comments or objection to this. Thank you.
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.
≈ 409 wallets
We’ll be following up with the exact number later today.
Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed
We have had a few bridge reserves over time:
Katalyst Bridge (UniV2, active): 0x10908c875d865c66f271f5d3949848971c9595c9
Pre-Katalyst, UniV2: 0x80827ce0d1b23ac2f30b4244d27b0aa904bda83c
v4, UniV1: 0x31e085afd48a1d6e51cc193153d625e8f0514c7f
v3, UniV1: 0x54a4a1167b004b004520c605e3f01906f683413d
v2, UniV1: 0x5d154c145db2ca90b8ab5e8fe3e716afa4ab7ff0
v1, UniV1: 0x13032deb2d37556cf49301f713e9d7e1d1a8b169
How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root.