Proposal: [Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Base
Vote: Yes
Summary: We support the deployment of Uniswap V3 on Base. We are very supportive of Uniswap’s multi-chain vision and expect Base to generate substantial TVL and on-chain activity. Ensuring Uniswap is ready for Base’s mainnet will be critical for capturing market share.
Proposal: Temperature Check - Uniswap V3 Deployment to Fantom
Vote: Yes
Summary: We shared our concerns in the forum about Fantom’s significant exposure to Multichain assets and the potential for Uniswap LPs to get hurt. Given this is only a temperature check, we are voting yes to progress further. However, we would like to wait for more clarity surrounding Multichain before proceeding further.
Proposal: Making Protocol Fees Operational: Fee options for V3
Vote: 1/5
Summary: A 20:80 fee split between the DAO:LPs should be sufficient to test the effects of activating the protocol fee. However, given the sheer amount of volume that comes through Uniswap we could see the fee split to the DAO being reduced in the future. We must also remain proactive in protecting Uniswap supply side.
Proposal: Making Protocol Fees Operational: Initial deployment chain
Vote: Polygon
Summary: Polygon has enough volume for this initial test to be informative and is not too large that any adverse effects should materially change Uniswaps position in DEX volume market share.
Proposal: Deploy UniswapV3 on Linea
Vote: Yes
Summary: We supportive Uniswap V3’s deployment on Linea. ConsenSys has built a widely used suite of tools that present a good opportunity for establishing development and activity on Linea. Specifically, capturing the first mover advantage in integrating with MM swaps could be significant for Uniswap.