We plan only to incentivize pools that have a return to the DAO. Beyond pools with the Protocol fee, this could, for example, include supporting No-Op hooked pools which have agreed to split fees or otherwise share economics (ie, via a token swap) with the DAO. Those decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis. That being said, as a general rule, we do not plan to support No-Op hooks that do not include fees. Our incentives will be in alignment with token holders.
Why is ETH/COMP incentivized? @Gauntlet
https://app.merkl.xyz/opportunities/unichain/UNISWAP_V4/0x3af4612009414fe93d5498ad2e33ccc3a7e0a26b
Gauntlet has ties to Morpho and Compound, Compound Blue etc. Why are UNI incentives being used to bootstrap Compound?
1 Like
Merkl and Gauntlet performed very poorly in this event. Uniswap’s front-end also had problems adding liquidity. Who made the decision to use Merkl and Gauntlet?
A complete collusion of interests
Hi! Just catching up on all the UNI campaign things. Congrats to all on the early success of $300M in liquidity… curious, what are the rates being paid? Does this mean just to Gauntlet? Is it recurring?
Also, one thing that feels like it could be better detailed, the rewards for each pool are stacked correct? So the Unichain and uni v4 rewards campaigns are stacked on top of each other? Or are the v4 rewards incentivizing pools on non-Unichain contracts?
TY for the clarification!