Curia Delegate Platform

Delegation Pitch
20

:page_with_curl::white_check_mark: [TEMP CHECK] Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo

I intend to vote FOR during this Temp Check because the proposal aligns with prior Uniswap deployments in emerging networks and offers more real-world use case visibility and growth in these ecosystems. Given that projects with a TVL under $800 million typically receive a $250k incentive, and Celo’s TVL is $124.57 million, this incentive seems appropriate. However, I remain mindful of questions surrounding liquidity quality, user sustainability, and project timeline.

:page_with_curl::white_check_mark: [Temp Check] - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement

I am voting FOR the adoption of the SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement as it provides a structured and effective solution to protect Uniswap’s funds during active exploits. The proposal establishes clear rules for intervention, including mandatory return of funds within 72 hours, and sets financial boundaries with a predefined 10% bounty (capped at $2.25M), matching Uniswap Labs’ existing bug bounty for V3. This ensures whitehats are fairly incentivized while avoiding conflicting priorities with standard vulnerability disclosures.

By offering legal protection and on-chain transparency, it ensures whitehats act ethically and effectively while aligning with industry best practices. This structured approach answers my concerns about accountability, incentives, and emergency response, strengthening Uniswap’s security and boosting user trust.

:page_with_curl::x: [TEMP CHECK] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3
We voted Against this proposal because the Metal L2 network currently shows very low activity and Total Value Locked (TVL). While we recognize the potential of bridging traditional finance with DeFi, we believe it is not productive to allocate incentives at this time. We are open to reconsidering if the network shows signs of maturity and traction in the future.

:page_with_curl::white_check_mark: Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns
We voted “Allow UAC Surplus Spending” to enable Uniswap to act decisively on time-sensitive, high-impact opportunities without the delays of the standard governance process. This allows for the rapid execution of co-incentive campaigns, such as the immediate $250,000 match with EtherFi, by leveraging existing surplus funds. The proposal includes clear spending limits and transparency through UAC reporting, ensuring both agility and accountability.