Uniswap Delegate Race Tiebreaker
We vote ‘Both (create an extra 16th spot)’ The tie-breaker for Cycle 2, which was voted on-chain, clearly states that “the tie will be decided by the date of the first on-chain vote.” We should honor this on-chain decision and adhere to the framework established by the DAO.
While we understand and appreciate the good intentions of the Working Group in resolving this situation, it is essential to respect the decision-making process that has already been carried out on-chain. The tie-breaker system from the initiative, though well-intentioned, was unexpectedly insufficient in this case. It’s encouraging to see Argonaut raising awareness about this, which will undoubtedly lead to improvements in future cycles.
As both delegates are equal under the established rule, I believe the fair decision is to vote “Both” and create a 16th spot. Though it expands the budget slightly, respecting the community-approved rule seems the most equitable choice, and both should be included.