The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We’ll be voting FOR this proposal while opting to select only Arbitrum and Base as the chains to analyze and monitor. We believe that focusing on the two chains with the highest TVL will be a good ‘proof of concept’.
Given that, we’d like to see an updated proposal before the on-chain vote to reflect the lower cost of analyzing and monitoring 2 chains -as opposed to the originally proposed 3, which was later amended to 4.
More importantly, however, we’d like to better understand the potential outcomes of such an analysis and Forse’s ultimate purpose in the DAO. Ideally, we’d like to see some sort of ‘ownership’ of the task of acting on the data collected and the insights from them. That could come from StableLabs or another party in the DAO (e.g., the Deployments Accountability Committee).