I voted FOR both
I think it is important not to miss the moment, so as not to end up in a situation where, due to the lack of quorum, we cannot resolve any issue
I also think it is important that the quorum is not reduced - this is an important and correct decision, in my opinion
I think this experimental solution is a good way out of the current situation
As I understand it, direct staking will be subject to legal problems, especially in accordance with DUNA
Also, I want to say that it is certainly important to check the contracts and this must be done before the on-chain vote is received, and at the moment we are voting for the initial decision - the technical part can be checked in parallel
I also think it is important that the quorum is not reduced - this is an important and correct decision, in my opinion
The distribution of 10 million UNI has already been carried out and this mechanism works, especially with restrictions of 2.5 (although it seems to me that this parameter can be reduced)