Just wanted to provide a bit of context on any overlap between addresses that we submitted vs what 0x submitted in terms of swaps made on Uniswap by DeFi Saver users.
The list of accounts we submitted as the accounts affected at DeFi Saver are only accounts that interacted with Uniswap via our UniswapWrapper. (Meaning the chain of accounts and contracts within the transaction that goes TxSender > UserDSProxy > DFS UniswapWrapper > Uniswap.)
Any list of accounts provided by 0x would have been from transactions that were TxSender > UserDSProxy > DFS 0xWraper > 0x > Uniswap. And we’ve also seen some DeFi Saver user accounts included by Kyber for transactions that were TxSender > UserDSproxy > DFS KyberWrapper > Kyber > Uniswap, for example.
While we didn’t consider these other cases eligible, it is definitely true that these, too, were initiated from an app integration, though there was additional routing involved.
If there’s any additional information that we can provide to help in drawing a better line we’re definitely available.