Ignas Delegate Platform

Delegation Pitch
21

27. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: April 11, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I support this proposal. Incentives can help grow TVL and liquidity on Uniswap v3.

    Supporting BOB also opens doors to Bitcoin DeFi, making Uniswap a key place for BTC LSTs, wBTC, and LBTC trading.

    That said, the DAO should keep a close eye on performance to ensure long-term sustainability.

22

28. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: April 14, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m voting yes because this proposal sets up a clear and strategic process to grow Uniswap v4 across multiple chains.

    It’s a good way to protect the product while also driving controlled and rapid ecosystem growth :slight_smile:

23

29. Proposal: BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package (Tally)

  • Date Voted: April 18, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Remainjng my support in Snapshot. This incentives can help grow TVL and liquidity on Uniswap v3.

    Supporting BOB also opens doors to Bitcoin DeFi, making Uniswap a key place for BTC LSTs, wBTC, and LBTC trading.

24

Date Voted: April 25, 2025

30. Proposal: UAC Renewal S4 (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: The UAC has proven to be a reliable operations team at the core of Uniswap DAO. Renewing it for Season 4 ensures continuity, strong coordination across chains, and smoother DAO execution.

    Support the proposal

31. Proposal: Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4) (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m in favor of this budget rebalancing to ensure that the commitments to existing programs are maintained.

    This rebalancing is a standard procedure and doesn’t involve any changes to the program’s overall scope or spending.

32. Proposal: [Temp Check/Revised] Treasury Delegation Round 2 (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Although few changes on delegation structure, I still vote yes with same reason on the old version.

    The lack of VP has made some delegates question whether it’s worth staying active in the DAO. They have a voice but no real power, means their contributions mostly serve those with bigger votes :slight_smile:

    Plus, setting expectations for delegates who receive VP makes sense, it ensures only those truly committed keep their delegation.

    So by maintaining a high quality delegate group, Uniswap DAO can make better decisions and drive long term growth.

25

33. Proposal: Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process (Tally)

  • Date Voted: April 29, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Voted yes for the same reason as in the Snapshot vote. This can set up a clear and strategic process to grow Uniswap v4 across multiple chains.

    It’s a good way to protect the product while also driving controlled and rapid ecosystem growth :slight_smile:

26

34. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: May 1, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m voting yes on this proposal. GFX Labs has done a great job so far, this proposal makes sense for growing V4 adoption.

    The integration costs are reasonable, but I’d appreciate a more detailed cost breakdown to better understand how the budget will be used.

1 Like
27

Date Voted: May 5, 2025

35. Proposal: UAC Renewal S4 (Tally)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: No reason to block this proposal onchain. The UAC has proven to be a reliable operations team at the core of Uniswap DAO. Renewing it for Season 4 ensures continuity, strong coordination across chains, and smoother DAO execution.

36. Proposal: Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)Vote onchain (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes same reason on Snapshot vote. This proposals ensures that the commitments to existing programs are maintained.

    This rebalancing is a standard procedure and doesn’t involve any changes to the program’s overall scope or spending.

37. Proposal: [Temp Check] Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: As a DAO gets bigger, it really needs a tool to track what’s going on, like how much TVL, volume, LPs, and real users actually came from the incentive program.

    From that data, DAO can:
    – Cut wasted costs on things that didn’t work.
    – Invest more into chains or pools that perform better.

    So the DAO can make smarter decisions overall :slight_smile:

    Even though it’s a one time payment, $60K for a tool is kinda pricey tbh. Would be helpful to see a cost breakdown, how much is for analysis, how much for the dashboard, and how much is StableLab’s fee so delegates can get a better picture.

    Overall, I’ll be voting yes on Snapshot.

38. Proposal: Four Chains for Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program (Snapshot)

  • Vote: 100% for Unichain
  • Rationale: It’s Uniswap’s own infrastructure. Including it in the Analytics Hub is essential to gather early insights, support its growth, and align the program with Uniswap’s long-term strategy.
28

39. Proposal: Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain (Tally)

  • Date Voted: May 14, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m voting YES on this proposal. It supports Uniswap V4 growth through a clear, well scoped integration with Oku and early adoption on Unichain.

    The license terms now include important guardrails, and GFX Labs has shown transparency in metrics and costs.

    This is a reasonable investment to expand the ecosystem while maintaining DAO oversight

1 Like
29

40. Proposal: Uniswap Accountability Committee S4 Elections (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: May 24, 2025

  • Vote: 50% for Doo Wan Nam, 50% for Takeshi Ohishi

  • Rationale: Casting my vote 50-50 between Doo Wan Nam and Takeshi because both bring highly relevant experience and complementary perspectives to the UAC.

    Doo Wan Nam has deep operational experience across multiple Uniswap DAO working groups and is already trusted with multisig responsibilities in both Uniswap and Compound. His ongoing role at StableLab can give him both macro level insights and practical governance knowledge.

    Takeshi is active in governance roles in Optimism, Lido, and Gitcoin. His technical background from Twitter and experience as a product manager at a startup position him well to bring executional rigor and strategic thinking to the UAC.

1 Like
30

41. Proposal: Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain (Tally)

  • Date Voted: June 3, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Sticking my support with the same reason on previous vote

    The proposal supports Uniswap V4 growth through a clear, well scoped integration with Oku and early adoption on Unichain.

    This is a reasonable investment to expand the ecosystem while maintaining DAO oversight

1 Like
31

42. Proposal: Trial run a Technical Advisory Board (TAB) (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: June 13, 2025

  • Vote: Against

  • Rationale: Voting against

    While I support the idea of bringing more technical input into governance, I don’t believe delegating 2.5M UNI to a pre-selected group without a community election is the right way.

    This can set a risky precedent, and the cost is quite high without clear accountability metrics.

32

Date Voted: June 18, 2025

43. Proposal: Uniswap Unichain - USDS and sUSDS Co-Incentives Growth Management Plan (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Unichain is in a growth stage but how does it grow when L2s aren’t much different from each other?

    App and user diversity is key. Currently, Unichain is growing thanks to incentives that are focused on Uniswap itself (and hooks).

    Thus, attracting established DeFi players like Sky makes sense.

    True, incentives are costly but if Unichain wants to grow, they can’t stop mid-journey anymore and more dApps must be supported.

    So, even when incentives are gone, diversity of dApps and users gives a higher chance of stickier users and TVL.

    Thus I support this proposal and vote For.