[Governance Proposal] Uniswap Unleashed
https://vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals/83
ABSTAIN
We voted to abstain on the Uniswap Unleashed proposal because while we appreciate the ambition behind the initiative, we believe several areas still require further clarification before we can fully commit our support. Specifically, we have concerns regarding the proposal’s expansive scope and the clarity of its performance metrics. The long‑term KPIs and intermediate milestones need to be more clearly defined to ensure that we can objectively measure progress and adjust strategy as needed. Additionally, the substantial funding request spread over multiple years raises questions about resource allocation and accountability.
We agree with concerns many delegates have brought up, including:
- Vague direction on fee sharing and fee switch
- Unichain ownership and vague direction of DAO legal structure
- Lump sum has no incremental or milestone-driven unlocks
- Vague onboarding direction of Core Contributors
We believe in the core direction of this proposal and the incentivization of univ4 and hook builders is necessary but its implementation contains some conflicts of interest and vague direction on DAO ownership/responsibility.