URGENT discussion on current vote: "Reduce UNI Governance Proposal & Quorum Thresholds"

[rezwile]

@Mr_Po

1. It is a Rider proposal. It means that it grabs the votes of people who want to reduce the proposal threshold while being neutral on lowering the Quorum threshold.

As there wasn’t even a topic on the forum focusing on lowering the quorum, it’s not a thing in the governance discourse, so more people are neutral.

2. People who delegated their votes towards Dharma & Gauntlet can’t revoke their votes if they don’t support the proposal.

The current voting procedure fails at its primary purpose: people expressing their will .

If you delegated your votes to Gauntlet because they promised to be politically neutral, and now they vote in contradiction to their statement and against your will, there’s nothing you can do.

3. Only votes that were delegated or self-delegated before the proposal can take part in the voting procedure.

Supporting the expressed concerns 100%. I feel a deep mistrust towards the proposal and voting system.
Please stop this now! Nearly noone will like the outcomes. It hurts uniswap governance.

• Have a longer voting period. With much more open discussion beforehand.
  Look at EIP in Ethereum. A healthy discussion is needed!
• Allow redirecting delegated anytime. Dont let people ‘be locked in’
• Dont allow changes of “voting limits” in the upcoming year.