My previous thread was locked, as it covered a broad range of ideas: UNI Devs should create a better way to vote
However, I wanted to expand on my original idea - It feels like Uniswap Governance (compared to projects like YFI) is generally weak - no proposals that we can vote on (only being discussed on a minor level), contributing members are having a hard time submitting their proposal due to requirements, etc.
My suggestion here is that Uniswap’s Development team should take bigger action - promoting the governance portal through social media channels, actively discussing proposals (providing feedback, sharing ideas), and generally ensuring that action is being taken and progress is made - because the governance forum now feels more like a fan project that has low prospects, rather than something serious. Afterall, they have the biggest interest - vested team tokens.
I’d love to hear what the rest of you guys think.
P.S. If a moderator decides to lock this thread (which is very usual of him to do), I would appreciate a heads up how this post could be altered so that some discussion could take place, regarding this matter.