First of all, huge thanks to the program managers of the initiative (@PGov Jun, @Doo_StableLab and @AranaDigital Abdullah) for their rigorous, patient and flexible operations on this matter. We are honored and grateful for being chosen based on the criteria that the program managers set and continuing our contributions to the governance further as we started doing so in the forum, online discussions, voting and offsite attendances!
Also thanks to @Argonaut for raising his voice on this matter and providing his perspectives.
While acknowledging potential confusions or possibility of interpreting the wordings in the original proposal differently, considering the purpose of the program which is to attract new delegates being active in the governance, we certainly support the decision flexibly made by the program managers, which is to apply the forum activity as a suitable tie-breaker measurement.
However, we also would like to respect what the DAO has to say about this issue and an outcome to be ratified on a Snapshot vote. We very much appreciate an additional consideration and voting decision from delegates on this matter in advance.
On a different note, we would also like to get involved in discussions to improve the Cycle 3 program by incorporating the feedback and learnings in the process!