Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2 Application

Governance-Meta
28

720×360 209 KB

Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2 Results

Authors: @Doo_StableLab @PGov @AranaDigital

Summary

This post outlines the results of Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2 application where over 20 candidates applied. Based on the criteria outlined, the following top 15 delegates were selected. Many of the newly qualified delegates joined the DAO less than 4 months ago, which once again, shows how the Delegate Reward Initiative has attracted new active and dedicated contributors. The full details can be found here.

Delegate Name Points Details
1 Michigan Blockchain 10
2 StableLab 10
3 Arana Digital 10
4 PGov 10
5 GFXlabs 10
6 Franklin DAO 9
7 Gauntlet 8.5
8 Karpatkey 8.5
9 404DAO 7
10 0xKeyRock 7
11 KFX (atiselsts.eth) 7
12 L2BEAT 7
13 SEEDGov 7
14 DAOplomats 6 Tie Breaker- Onchain
15 Tané 6 Had to go to 3 tiebreakers: Tie Breaker- Onchain, Tie Breaker- Offchain, Tie Breaker- Forum Activity

Notes

  1. @Bobbay requested to count as co-author of Uniswap Delegate Reward -3 Months-Cycle 1. However, as Bobbay was not explicitly mentioned as a co-author, and since other members of the Uniswap Delegate Reward Working Group such as L2 Beat and karpatkey did not count themselves as a co-author of this proposal, we believe it’s fair to not count it towards the delegate’s points.

  2. @BlockworksResearch requested to count as author of [RFC]: Uniswap Community Calls. As the RFC did not proceed and pass the snapshot vote, as specified in the requirement, we believe it’s fair to not count it.

Thoughts for Cycle 3

We have received feedback from various participants and stakeholders on how the Delegate Reward Initiative can be improved.

For Cycle 3, we will examine incorporating the following elements

  1. Governance Data Platform
  2. Automated Communications and Voting through third party like Karma
  3. Exploring more criteria for full rewards
6 Likes