I’m voting yes on this proposal. It tackles some real funding gaps to keep key DAO programs—like Tally’s governance tools and UEII’s liquidity deals—up and running without hiccups. The $280,142 budget request also seems justified.
I get that there’s no surplus right now, but the discretionary budget we already approved gives the UAC room to handle this kind of thing, so I’m not too worried about rebalancing concerns. The UAC’s disclosure with SafeNotes is also pretty transparent, and their 10/12 onchain votes plus regular community calls make me trust they’ll manage this well. This feels like a solid, transparent move to keep the DAO strong and on track.