100% agree on getting more developer representation. especially with uni v4 coming out, and with more hook developers entering the ecosystem, ensuring their interests are sufficiently represented will be an important input to their long term commitment to building on uniswap
@Doo_StableLab above has a great point. will note though that I believe the issue here is more on the side of passive delegators who have delegated and are not tracking the activities of their delegates. a trickier problem to solve particularly in the case of anonymous delegators
re other comments in the thread - I generally believe that, if the long term personal interests of the delegate are in line with the interests of the protocol, for instance, if a hook developer is building a project on top of uni v4, and they benefit as uni v4 grows in market share / activity, I we can care less about measuring “thoughtfulness” of feedback or length of post – their feedback matters simply because their interests/opinion matter, as contributors to long term protocol success
(this comment represents my personal opinion and not that of the UF!)