Agreed on the experiment. Historically builders in any ecosystem tends to not be as active as other figures. This is something worth improving, because builders are the ones who make the ecosystem extremely valuable.
Aligning incentives can probably help.
- Does for example make sense to involve teams that, after a grant from any uniswap related program, deliver a succesfull product, to keep them even more tied to the ecosystem? Aligning incentive is: uniswap did help me improve my product, I am going to stay involved in what is happening around here.
- Can we also involve historically og developers, teams and contributors? Aligning incentive is: I have been a core contributor of main uniswap products, or partners’ products, my whole life, and staying in touch with governance will help me drive decision and steer the convo toward topics that interest me. But this poses the secondary question: how come that these ogs were not interested to be involved in the first place?
Likely there are even more cases, I just mentioned the first two coming to my mind.