A process could be the following:
- create a shortlist of developers that are considered quite important for the ecosystem
- [optional] open an RFC for other developers who would like to participate to this
- create a matrix that lists all of these devs, on one side governance participation (in %), on the other impact on the ecosystem.
The best elements from the matrix could be put to snapshot to assign delegation, with potential expiring mechanisms discussed in the other thread.
Few things here:
- defining initial list might introduce subjectivity
- defining impact can be too subjective unless we also define proper kpi (ie: tvl contribution through the product or other). Due to uniswap’s nature, is extremely likely that any list won’t be omincomprehensive.
Point 2 is likely mitigated by being a bit more loose on evaluation and inclusion in the snapshot, so that dao has space to give their opinion.