This will give us data on how turning the fee switches on may affect the liquidity that is already in the protocol.
Saying “we enable the fee switch but only for a short while / testing” is one of the worst thing you can do on v2. As on v2 the fees are moved from a user account into the fee switch recipient when the user remove liquidity.
The only thing you incentivise then is just removing liquidity later as if you enable the fee switch but only for a short while, only the liquidity removed while it was enabled will count towards it.
This would give unreliable data due to a part of LP that would prefer to wait when the testing is done instead of taking their money now (and giving up 1/6 of the fees to the goverance).
I still say we flip the switch on everything, if liquidity providers want that exposure, buy some UNI if you dont have any. Most I assume, are UNI whales
After the Community Call on the 16th of June, the topic of the fee switch being turned on as a, “Buyback and Keep” model was thoroughly discussed with the community being overwhelmingly in favor of implementing such a proposal. The fee switch would be turned on the V2 to incentivize people to migrate to V3 with a 90 day timelock for V3 when the fee switch would turn on there as well.
Some key delegates also expressed their approval of such a proposal and the next steps will be discussed on the Penguin´s Party discord.