currently, Uniswap is dominating dex volumes
main competitors volume combined is less than 25% of Uniswap volume
Uniswap LPs are making around 1m $ a day from trading fees so no more incentives are needed
UNI should be spent to grow Uniswap, not for unneeded liquidity incentives
We should ask for farming incentives to UNI delegators instead…
1- this will be 2 times more efficient at supporting UNI price.
2- will increase the number of delegators instead of decreasing the number with ETH-UNI pool.
3- will offer more protection against governance attacks
Small than these rewards …come on! probably you never did liquidity provide… it is supper “worth” trust me and the rewards are amazing …(sarcastic)
don’t understand the sarcasm, I am quite happy with my lp earnings even though in some time intervalls impermanent loss is larger than the gain in fees. But as long as you are convinced on the value of all assets you provide the impermanent loss in USD doesn’t hurt, cause you get more of your valued asset in your pool even if the USD denominated value decrease (it’s just like buying cheap).
the amount of UNI printed every week should go down, not sure by how much
UNI-ETH LP should be incentivized, unsure of the weight this pool could have vs the others
we have to make sure UNI-ETH LPers can vote before voting these new incentives
incentivization is good but would need to be more dynamic in the future, as governance is proving to be very slow right now
in the future :
incentivization of liquidity could be more dynamic and use a UNI staking system instead of tedious governance votes (UNI holders choose incentivized pools by staking their UNI and voting for that pool)
such a system would of course need to be “audited” so that it’s not gameable
such a system would require a new upgrade to the voting system (staked UNI should have voting power)
developers could be hired via treasury to achieve this