Thank you for working on the updated version of this initiative. Before providing feedback on the proposal, we want to express our gratitude for the opportunity granted to us through this program.
We believe this proposal is an improvement over the previous one in several ways:
-
Offchain and Onchain Voting Brackets: These are much more effective than in the previous program, where many delegates received all the points despite relatively low voting participation. The weight assigned to these factors in the overall score is well-balanced, as they are the most critical aspects of a delegate’s role.
-
Community Call Participation: The new brackets make much more sense compared to the previous program, where delegates could easily earn a point by attending just one community call.
-
Tie-breaker: This is now clearly defined and is unlikely to create any conflicts.
-
Removal of Seniority Points: We support the decision to remove the additional point for delegates with six months of seniority, as we felt it provided an unfair advantage.
What we think could be a good addition
We think the inclusion of an extra point for delegates who attended all community calls, voted, and provided their rationale for every on-chain and off-chain vote over the past six months would be a very good addition. A bonus point for perfect participation in the second cycle could help recognize those who remained consistent during the 6 months.
Regarding pepo’s comment:
We agree that this restriction makes sense. While we have been late once or twice, we will ensure this doesn’t happen again. In our case, our team made the voting decision during a meeting, but the team member responsible for preparing the rationale was a new hire and needed more time. Moving forward, we will make sure to share our rationale promptly after the vote.