[Temperature Check] Create the Uniswap Foundation

Uniswap Foundation: Preamble

Uniswap has already changed the world.

In only 3 years, the world’s first automated market maker has pioneered DeFi primitives, supported more than $1T in cumulative volume, and served millions of users worldwide. Its daily volume today is on par with Coinbase.

Ownership of the protocol was transferred to the community in 2020 and since then the Uniswap Grants Program (UGP) has demonstrated the potential for community-funded initiatives to make a positive impact. Over 1.5 years, UGP has funded 120+ grantees improving governance, and developing new interfaces and developer tooling.

However, there is still work to do to help Uniswap reach its full potential. The governance process has too much friction, the ecosystem is too difficult to navigate, and UGP in its current form is not able to fund the most ambitious and impactful projects.

We want to change that.

Today, we are excited to propose the creation of the Uniswap Foundation, which has the mission to support the decentralized growth and sustainability of the Uniswap Protocol and its supporting ecosystem and community.

In other words, the goal of the Uniswap Foundation is to support you.

Uniswap’s community is expansive, encompassing the universe of individuals and organizations which build on and benefit from decentralized protocols. Your contributions have already made Uniswap a success, but we want to help you accomplish much more.

The Uniswap Foundation (UF) will provide grants to builders, researchers, organizers, academics, analysts, and more to grow the Protocol and plan for its future.

It will make it easier to govern the protocol and community treasury, and to navigate the broader ecosystem.

It will help you make an impact – to reduce friction, and amplify your efforts.

We believe that Uniswap will be the value exchange layer of the Internet.

It brought the automated market maker to the masses.

It has led the way in the evolution and growth of DeFi and web3.

It is censorship resistant, permissionless, decentralized, and secure – constituting a set of properties which we believe should define our world’s financial infrastructure.

But there is still a long way to go for Uniswap to reach its full potential.

We’re excited to work with all of you to make that happen.

If you’re excited too, please read our proposal, comment, reach out to chat (our DMs - @devinawalsh and @nkennethk are open!), and spread the word.

Uniswap Foundation Proposal

This proposal is being put forth by the Uniswap Foundation, a Delaware corporation formed by Uniswap community members Devin Walsh and Ken Ng to facilitate the steps outlined in this proposal.


  • Today, we are thrilled to propose the creation of the Uniswap Foundation (UF).
  • Scope: The UF, the first Foundation of a major protocol to go through the community governance process, will support the Protocol’s decentralized growth, reinvigorate governance, and serve as a Protocol advocate.
  • Team: Devin Walsh will serve as the Executive Director, Ken Ng will serve as Head of Operations, and they will build out a team of 12.
  • Budget: To fund these efforts, we are requesting:
    • A $14M Operating budget to cover a full team for 3 years
    • A $60M expanded Uniswap Grants Program (UGP) budget to cover 3+ years
    • We are requesting $74M total, which will be broken into two disbursements, with a first disbursement of $20M.
  • Governance Participation: We are also requesting 2.5M UNI to participate in governance, primarily through delegation. Through usage of a new smart contract primitive The Franchiser, this UNI will be revocable by the DAO at any time, and cannot be used for any purpose outside of governance.

Uniswap Foundation


In pursuit of a more open and fair financial system, the Uniswap Foundation supports the decentralized growth and sustainability of the Uniswap Protocol and its supporting ecosystem.

Key Activities and OKRs

We have listed our starting OKRs below. It’s possible these OKRs will have to change in the future. If they do change in a meaningful way, we will communicate that to the community.

Growth: Promoting Decentralization & Growth of the Protocol and Ecosystem

Governance: Reinvigorating the Uniswap Community Governance Process

Advocacy: Advocating for the Protocol and amplifying its positive social impact

Optimism Phase 0 token distribution link here

Year 1 Roadmap

Our roadmap for the first year of operations includes but is not limited to the following activities:

Optimism Collective community Constitution link here


Devin Walsh, Executive Director (ED)

As ED, Devin will be responsible for setting UF’s strategic vision alongside the Board and driving execution to achieve that vision.

Devin has been in crypto since 2016. She has conducted independent research for MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative, worked on decentralized identity at uPort (ConsenSys), and led protocol and venture investments at CoinFund. She has consulted with Edge & Node and cLabs, and led MIRA, a seed stage startup at the intersection of fine art and NFTs. She recently resigned as Chief of Staff at Uniswap Labs in order to propose the creation of the UF.

Ken Ng, Head of Operations

As Head of Operations, Ken will build and scale processes to maximize the UF’s impact.

Ken has served the Uniswap ecosystem as Lead of the Uniswap Grants Program for the past 1.5 years. He has helped run the Ethereum Foundation Ecosystem Support Program, which gave Hayden his initial grant to build Uniswap. He served as COO of Slingshot Finance and cofounder of his nonprofit eduDAO, which helps raise funds for students and teachers in the Bronx.

The needs, and thus the makeup, of our team may change over time. However, today we aim to hire for following roles, with a focus on filling the Grants and Governance roles first:


Applications are open today! Check out job descriptions here.

As noted by Other Internet, there is also a need for new structures to “facilitate coordination across the complex web of stakeholders” within the Uniswap ecosystem. To provide this much needed coordination, the UF will be committed to working with a variety of independent parties (freelancers, development teams, research fellows, analysts, and more) to achieve many of its objectives.


The Foundation’s initial advisory team will be made up of the following individuals:

  1. Jesse Walden, Founder and GP, Variant
  2. Julia Rosenberg, Co-Founder, Orca Protocol
  3. Alexis Gauba, Co-Founder, Opyn; Co-Founder, she256
  4. Hart Lambur, Co-Founder of UMA

In addition to advising UF on strategy and roadmap, this group will, alongside the Executive Director (ED) and Head of Operations,

  1. Provide input on UF’s initial hiring decisions. This may include interviewing potential candidates and sharing feedback with the Committee as it determines its first hires, including its third Board member and at least next three team members.
  2. Become temporary signers of the UF multi-sig, which will hold UF funds if and when the proposal is passed, for the sole purpose of executing approved proposals as instructed. This responsibility will be transitioned to UF team members once they are hired.


Devin Walsh and Ken Ng will serve as the first two Board members of the UF. Alongside the UF’s Advisors, they will interview and target to hire a third Board member in the first 3 months of operations.


We are requesting $74M in UNI. This funding would be broken down into the following buckets:

  • $60M for Uniswap Grants Program

Grants spending will be broken down into the below categories. We will revisit and readjust these categories as needed to ensure we continue to deploy resources where they are most impactful.

We are proud of the work done by UGP thus far (memorialized in this retrospective), and are incredibly excited to expand the scope of its work.


We are already in the process of assessing several high impact grant proposals which UGP would be excited to fund, if and when this proposal is passed. Two examples are:

  1. A version of Uniswap v3 written in Cairo, to be deployed on Starknet
  2. A prototype of an MEV estimation tool leveraging machine learning techniques built by respected academics in the space

We are also excited to continue funding ongoing work by existing grantees funded by UGP v0.1, including governance experiments and analyses from Other Internet, customer support from Serv.eth, and ETHGlobal hackathons.

To ensure community alignment with larger grants disbursements, the UF will put forth an off-chain Snapshot to the community for proposed grants larger than $2M.

We believe that this Grants budget will last approximately 3 years but this is subject to change depending upon the number and quality of applicants. We plan to approach the Treasury for additional Grants funds when there are ~6 months of funds remaining.

  • $14M operating budget to build out a full team of 12 over the next two years.

In order to provide stability to our employees and to sustain the Foundation, we may make a request to the community for additional funding for further out than 3 years when we return to the Treasury at 6-12 months of operations (read more below).

Budget estimate looking forward three years is below.


*Inclusive of UNI vesting. In order to incentivize a highly qualified team, the UF will offer competitive compensation packages including both fiat and long-term vesting UNI. To provide full transparency, we will disclose UF financials later this year.

**The UF will allocate an additional $2M in funds to cover legal fees in the case of unexpected future litigation.

Fund Disbursements

An approval of this proposal is an approval for the full $74M budget requested.

We are requesting the funds in two disbursements:

  1. $20M now to cover operating expenses for the next 2 years and grants for 1 year. Assuming a UNI price of $7.04*, this initial request totals to 2,840,909 UNI.
  2. $54M, to be disbursed by the Uniswap Treasury in 6-12 months once the UF has completed the establishment of its legal entity. The UF will publish a post on the forum notifying the community a week prior to putting forth a formal governance proposal for the remaining funds. In other words, because this proposal approves the full amount of funding, we will not go through an additional the Temperature Check and Consensus Check steps to receive this second disbursement.

*To calculate our final UNI request we will use the 30 day TWAP on the day we put forth our Governance Proposal. $7.04 is approximately the 30 day TWAP as of 8/3/2022.

Governance Participation

The UF is also requesting 2.5M UNI to participate in governance.

These tokens will be delegated to the UF by the Uniswap DAO through a new smart contract design, The Franchiser, which ensures the tokens are only used for delegation, and allows the DAO to claw back the tokens at any time. The UF plans to use these tokens primarily for delegation to community members without the requisite 2.5M UNI to submit a governance proposal, however the UF may also self-delegate the UNI to vote, and to put up its own proposals.

The Franchiser was developed by Noah Zinsmeister and was audited by Trail of Bits.

Next Steps

We are excited to discuss this proposal with the broader community as it passes through the Request for Comment phase. Should sentiment be positive, a Temperature Check Snapshot poll will be set up on Mon., August 8. If the Temperature Check poll passes, additional feedback will be incorporated before moving forward to the Consensus Check.

Additionally, to discuss the proposal and answer your questions, we plan to attend the Uniswap Community call at 4 PM EST on Wed., August 10, and to host a Twitter Spaces on @uniswapgrants at 11 AM EST on Mon., August 15.


What is UF’s relationship with other ecosystem entities?

The goal of the UF is to be one of many organizations supporting the Protocol. UF’s overarching focus will be on seeding and growing an ecosystem of entities supporting the Protocol.

What is UF’s relationship with Uniswap Labs?

The UF is an independent entity whose mandate will be to grow Uniswap’s usage, reinvigorate the governance process, and advocate for the protocol and community. To achieve those goals, it will build its own lean team, and provide grants to, support, and/or work alongside a number of existing and new values- and mission-aligned organizations.

Uniswap Labs is one of many organizations in the Uniswap ecosystem. It built, deployed, and, alongside many other teams, will continue to contribute to and build on the Protocol in the future.

As a commitment to the proper decentralization of the protocol, Uniswap Labs had previously provided a royalty free perpetual license for V3 and related trademarks to the Uniswap Grants Program and selected grantees at UGP’s discretion. To succeed, the UF will require the ability to grant v3 BSL license exemptions, to maintain the governance forum, Sybil.org, and Protocol-related developer docs, and to help facilitate protocol development across many teams. Labs has given their blessing to this preliminary proposal for asset transition.

What kind of legal entity will UF be?

Currently, this proposal is being made by the Uniswap Foundation, a pre-existing Delaware corporation formed by Uniswap community members Devin Walsh and Ken Ng. However, the UF team is conducting extensive research to determine the type of legal entity which best matches our ambitions, including our mission to make a positive social impact. The entity should also give the UF the ability to enter into contracts, open a bank account, and hire employees. Given these requirements, we are contemplating a US-based entity that would seek tax-exempt status. As there is no guarantee that tax-exempt status will be secured, we may make modifications to UF’s structure and operations in the future. We will share more about our path forward with the community as soon as we are able to.

What will happen to the $UNI after it’s sent to the UF?

If the proposal passes, funds will be sent to the UF multi-sig, which is custodied by the ED, Head of Operations, and UF Advisors.

To provide runway for our team and grantees, we intend to convert all $20M of the initial UNI disbursement to stablecoins and fiat over the first month of operation. We have established relationships with multiple brokers, are also exploring private sale options, and plan to pursue an approach which will minimize UNI price impact.

We similarly plan to diversify the remainder of funds in the second disbursement. At least one month prior to transfer, the UF will publish a Foundation Treasury Diversification report for this UNI. In the report, we will detail the amount we plan to diversify, which broker we plan to use, and how we plan to price the UNI sold.

How does UF’s Budget compare with the budgets of similar organizations across web3?

The $74M budget represents ~1.05% of the total UNI supply. This is a relatively small percentage of UNI supply compared to the percentage of tokens allocated to Foundation and Grant programs by other protocol teams.

  • 45% of OP tokens have been allocated to an Optimism Ecosystem Fund (25%) and Retroactive public goods funding (20%) (here)
  • An unpublished portion of ~22% of dYdX were allocated to current and future employees and consultants of the Foundation (here)
  • ~26% of GRT was allocated to The Graph Foundation, educational programs, and grants (here)
  • 25% of CELO was allocated to Community and Operational Grants (here)
  • 12.5% of SOL was allocated to the Solana Foundation (here)
  • The Ethereum Foundation holds a treasury of $1.6B (here)

What happens to UGP and the UGP Subcommittees?

To start, UGP will continue operations as it exists today with the existing Allocation Committee. Once the Grants Lead is hired, they will lead all grants funding decisions and require final approval from either Devin or Ken (⅔ approval required from Grants Lead, Ken, and Devin).

UF plans to continue to fund the existing UGP subcommittees as separate, supportive entities. The Stable subcommittee will continue to be made up of Ken and Boris. The UGP Community Analytics subcommittees will continue to be made up of Yj, Fede, RantumBits, Annamira, TZM, and Trea Qura.

How does the UF plan on being sustainable over time?

This proposal would fund UF operations for at least 3 years. In the future, we plan to return to the community to increase our operating budget when we approach 18 months of runway.

We also predict our grants budget will last approximately 3 years. In the future, we plan to return to the community to increase our grants budget when we approach 6 months of funds remaining.

If this proposal is passed, we and the Foundation shall undertake our work abiding by the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

It is the Foundation’s current intent to use the disbursement in accordance with the terms of, and achieve the results described in, this Proposal. However, it is not possible to predict the course of future events, and thus actual uses and results may vary. If material changes to the operations of the Uniswap Foundation are required, we intend to put forth a subsequent vote to the community prior to making those changes.

Subject to any future agreement by the DAO to the contrary, the Foundation will hold the DAO and its members harmless with respect to any liabilities or damages assessed against the Foundation or its personnel based upon the making of the disbursement, the Foundation’s or its personnel’s use of the disbursed tokens or any other activities undertaken by the Foundation or its personnel in furtherance of the foregoing, other than liabilities or damages arising out of the DAO’s fraud, willful misconduct or criminal activity.

Disclosure: Devin and Ken both hold UNI tokens. To the extent that readers find it relevant, Devin also holds a small amount of Uniswap Labs equity.


I think this proposal represents much needed progress of our journey as a community going forward. The budget is not an overarching issue as the post has stated multiple other foundations have asked for a lot more.

Overall, I do think this proposal is a huge plus going forward mainly with the open call for the community regarding open positions.


Hello Uniswap Foundation! We have really enjoyed seeing this proposal being fleshed out and are incredibly satisfied with the final proposal/temp check! We are very confident in the team and are also incredibly optimistic for the future specifically with respect to governance. We look forward to getting more involved on this front and would love to contribute! :slight_smile:


A decentralised smart contract does not require a centralised team to thrive or function. Uniswap’s goal should be 0 fees and to act as a public good. Middle man fee skimming and nepotism is what brought the economy and socioeconomic to its current state. Let’s not repeat the mistakes and greed of the past and add value to ethereum as a whole instead which is to be the ultimate decentralised money and not a fee skimming machine.


The proposal looks thorough and I am largely in favor of the Uni community having a separate, community-elected team to supercharge its future growth.

However, given that there have been a lot of discussions around fee switch, I am wondering whether experimenting with fee switch and doing research around how to best implement fee switch is a part of your roadmap? And if yes, what’s the plan around it?

Uniswap does not need a Foundation. The grant process is already opaque and lopsided. The budget drains treasury funds that should be attributable to token holders.

1 Like

Do you remember the situation with Optimism? Uniswap Treasury had one million OP tokens left unclaimed. Who was the person responsible to make the claim? Nobody knew. Was it the Labs? They should not be representing the DAO. Was it the UGP? Is it in their scope of responsibility to be doing such things? That´s what I´d call opaque…and we are talking about 1M USD just left there.

The Uniswap Community absolutely requires someone to work in its interest. This should bring overall long term value to the token holders as well. Otherwise, situations akin to the OP one will only snowball further.

Another notable mentions: Polygon liquidity mining rewards…


One more thing:

It seems that the proposed foundation is overlapping with the Uniswap labs team on a lot of tasks (protocol R&D, implementation, interfaces, etc). What’s the relationship between the Uniswap labs team and the foundation? Wouldn’t these tasks be best completed by the Uniswap team rather than the foundation given that they have more experience on this as the founding members of the protocol?

1 Like

There’s a whole section titled “What is UF’s relationship with Uniswap Labs”.

I’m not a Labs employee or shareholder, but in general, it is a private company whose roadmap can vary based on how they best see fit to allocate their resources with no obligation to continue working on Uniswap. The UF’s roadmap will vary on how they best see fit to allocate their resources in the service of the Uniswap protocol.


That’s a good point. So, 1M definitely accounted for with a Foundation. That’s great. If you noticed, they are asking for over 70M dollars.

Thank you! Yes, we’ve very excited to bring on current community members onto the team, if the proposal passes. Anyone can take a look at open roles and apply today - Uniswap Foundation


Polygons liquidity mining campaign was worth 20M USD. Initially, no liq. mining campaign happened until community members started urging Mihaylo to live up to his promises.

There are bound to be other examples down the road and if nobody is responsible to take care of these things then the loss will snowball harder than the budget of the UF.


Nice proposal. It is interesting to have another entity that contributes to Uniswap and helps to shift the balance of power which imo leans too much towards uniswap labs.


What I don’t understand is who owns the equity in this newly formed foundation? Is it Labs, Devin or someone else?

1 Like

I think the OKR’s need to be rewritten both to ensure accountability to token holders and for the foundation to eventually defend itself against skeptical token holders. The primary key result metrics, as I read them, are % allocation of the budget. These could be achieved with the stroke of a pen regardless of the effectiveness of resource allocation. While the proportions are useful to communicate, they are not helpful for evaluation.

It is a bit concerning that they were written this way because it implies that the spending of funds is primary rather than return on investment.

1 Like

It would be well within the scope of the UF to welcome, encourage, and provide grants to research and analysis on the fee switch, and to promote better education around the mechanics of fee switch implementation. It would also be well within the scope of the UF to assist the community in decision-making regarding the fee switch, including putting out information regarding any polls or governance proposals regarding the fee switch (just as we intend to for all other governance proposals). It’s been awesome to see all the enthusiasm and debate in the forums on this topic and would be excited to do all of the above if and when the proposal passes.


Great proposal! As a builder in the Uniswap Ecosystem, I believe the foundation is the right approach to grow Uniswap.

I hope you will build a distributed and diverse team so the foundation’s impact can be widespread.

Also, curious going forward about how much visibility the foundation will have on Labs’ roadmap and development. Would that impact on voting and grant decisions (eg: will foundation would vote against a proposal if it knows it impacts Labs’ roadmap?)


Speaking for Other Internet, we are very enthusiastic about this proposal.

Since last year, we’ve put released 3 comprehensive deep dives into the governance challenges facing the Uniswap community, and are about to release a 4th. In all of our work we’ve consistently identified one issue common to all of Uniswap governance’s various problems. That issue is the lack of a clear center of authority and source of legitimacy.

The outcomes such a party’s absence include:

  • high levels of politicking needed to get anything done
  • voter apathy and delegate fatigue
  • slow operational decentralization
  • lack of accountability in partnerships (more on this in our forthcoming paper)
  • difficulty in improving the governance process

We are supportive of the proposed foundation because we believe it will address these problems, not only through various initiatives, but also by simply being an actor with the mandate to be a channel for various stakeholders to connect and get things done. That there are dev relations, delegate relations, and partnership leads roles listed (with job postings already!) is a hugely positive sign for the type of operational capacity and speed that the foundation should unlock for Uniswap governance.

As a side note, I hope this proposal makes clear what I’ve been advocating for in the fee switch conversation. There are a lot of things that need to happen for Uniswap protocol to continue to grow; with or without protocol revenue, the Foundation is the best bet to make those things happen.

TL;DR - Uniswap Foundation is an entity that can represent the interests of the protocol and its various stakeholders. It can scope projects, be a legal counterparty, liaise with delegates and get things done. We simply haven’t had haven’t had this before, and it’s the biggest step we can take toward more efficiency here. Devin and Ken are excellent and have a proven track record, and we are looking forward to working with them on new governance initiatives.


This is a good question. In order for Uniswap Protocol to become the value exchange layer of the Internet (which we believe it should be), we believe there should be many diverse and talented teams building on it. There are many teams outside of Labs building on the Protocol today (many are listed in the UGP retrospective) however we believe there is a massive opportunity for grants to fund additional ambitious and impactful projects. The governance of the protocol is another key to long term Protocol sustainability that in our opinion requires some reinvigoration - we are excited to work with the community to ensure the governance process is efficient and effective. The UF will build a lean team and have a grants budget focused on exactly these things: Protocol growth, decentralization, and sustainability.

Uniswap Labs is one of many organizations in the Uniswap ecosystem. It built, deployed, and, alongside many other teams, will continue to contribute to and build on the Protocol in the future.

1 Like

I don’t disagree. I’m not asking for people to work out of the kindness of their hearts. I am going to question why if that’s the sole goal (which requires a legal analysis) do we need to fork over 14M in operating dollars to build a team of 12. That’s pork and spending for other things. Size it all down and work provisionally. You can come back in 6mo to ask for more.