Repeating what I posted in Discord:
Is Uniswap aware/worried about the possibility of a security issue regarding repairing hashes with Beacon Chain?
If this thing is not really a blockchain it means whoever is repairing these hashes is operating the system. We can debate how and to what degree Bitcoin, Ethereum and other blockchains are decentralized. But nobody there is repairing hashes looking backwards whereas here things look decidedly less like Satoshi’s vision.
datafinnovation[dot]medium[dot]com[slash]bnb-beacon-chain-not-a-blockchain-3230dda7172c
(I know nothing about “datafinnovation” except they were mentioned in an Arthur Hayes blog post and many of their posts seemed prescient of later issues being revealed.)
Aave, for example, will go on a chain and then remove support if there is security risk (i.e. a reliance on a single bridge, pre-or-post that bridge being compromised). This post suggests serious security risks. I know BSC is attractive considering its TVL, but this could have serious implications, no?