Hi, thank you for the proposal!
We have a query. We understand that the service offered in this proposal is the same or very similar to the one already provided by Merkl at different Uniswap Service Providers, Working Groups and Committees. Is this correct? Do you think you could complement each other, or would it be a competitor?
As a differential and innovation point we noticed that you offer the possibility to configure KPIs, is there any other difference or differential that you offer with respect to Merkl?
For example, we note that Merkl provides services in different Uniswap proposals and initiatives:
- Governance Proposal - Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo
- [Temp Check] - Combined Liquidity Incentivization Proposal
- rbitrum LTIPP Incentive Matching
- [RFC] Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns
- [RFC] Deploy Uniswap v3 on X Layer
- Onboarding Package for Gnosis Chain
- Uniswap Deployments Accountability Committee [Update Thread]
We extend the consultation to @AbdullahUmar , @Juanbug , @alphagrowth , @PGov . @AranaDigital , @fin_areta @kpk if you can inform us whether you are indeed using Merkl’s services in the above mentioned initiatives and whether you understand that this would be compatible with the present proposal which offers in our view similar services.