Hey Erik, thanks for the message, jumping into your three questions; since the metagovernance group is only looking to cover the grant hunting aspect of this, we’ll answer with respect to that and @alphagrowth can answer with respect to marketing and their other proposed initiatives.
1: Forum posts detailing outcomes is likely the way forward. For Arb this time, we have a dashboard that the Gauntlet team helped set up as they decided on incentive allocation.
2: In terms of system for transparency and conflict of interest, nothing comes to mind with respect to conflicts or interest, however if they arise, we would post transparently on the forums
3: Partnership vetting process for the start in our opinion makes sense to just be the chains that Uni is deployed on. If other groups want to airdrop tokens to the DAO for involvement and/or allocate grants, it might make sense to get involved there as well.
I’d take a look at this earlier post by the metagovernance team too: here.