Request for Proposals - ARB Distribution

Requests for Comment
44

No matter the strategy, there is no guarantee that delegates will always act in the best interest of either protocol. It is essential to have mechanisms to replace individuals regularly. In this case, scheduled redelegation every x months would achieve this.

This is a good program. The advantage is reduced complexity and governance overhead. The Create a UNI-ARB Working Group appears to be significantly more complex than the Uniswap Optimism Protocol Delegation Program because, as proposed, it requires multiple working group structures.

45

Hey again. Following up from my post here Request for Proposals - ARB Distribution - #5 by Dakotah

I am sorry that I missed that I was supposed to create a separate proposal for this. Have we missed the window and therefore have no shot at all? We may be smaller than a lot of the projects listed here but we are a permissionless platform built on top of Uni v3. We dont manage funds or do any of these tasks that involve trust. We pushed a lot of volume from Frax onto Uniswap and plan to continue growing with them and elsewhere. We will be on Arbitrum next month. I request that Bunni isnt left in the dark because of my mistake or not partnering with specific projects just to increase likelihood that we get the grant… Our fees are only 10% of LP swap fees! We are good for Uniswap!

1 Like
46

Snapshot is posted here and goes live in five hours. Thanks to the proposing teams and good luck!

3 Likes
47

We’re glad to see this moving forward and have voted in favor of Combined Liquidity Incentives and MMA Infrastructure Development proposals.

We appreciate the collaboration between the complementary Gauntlet and Gamma Strategies proposals and, considering the Architectural Reccomendations in the recent bridge assessment, it is prudent also to support the MMA Infrastructure Development proposal.

A possibility exists that a remainder of ARB will be available when this polling process concludes. If the total balance requested by the passing proposals is significantly less than the ~4.4m ARB available, we would support the remaining balance be allocated to the UF in alignment with the backstop proposal.

3 Likes
48

Hi, what are next steps?

49

We agreed that the remaining balance should be allocated to the UF’s proposal.

2 Likes
50

Is there any progress for the onchain vote?

51

Still no progress on the ARB distribution?

52

So that’s it no distribution???

54

It is important to have multiple ALM options as that offers more competition and there for more efficient liquidity.

55

Have been waiting for several weeks without a response on the status of this. Can we get some kind of update please @eek637

56

the vote has been live since last week and the temp check post has been updated to reflect that. the proposers spent 6 weeks working behind the scenes talking to delegates to give it the best chances of passing.

58

What is the status of this? We have not heard from anyone from the proposal team at all.

59
60

We at Brincx were part of the proposal team meaning that we should have gotten some allocation or at least some notification about what was to happen. This is not right. Is this fair to just exclude Brincx from this process?

2 Likes
61

Did you guys really just start the incentives program without contacting and updating every protocol that was accepted in the proposal? ehm…

62

@Brincnomics - For advanced notice of future incentive allocations, please DM us, and we’ll connect over Telegram to deliver that. This goes for any/all ALMs interested in participating.