I am curious what designs this comittee would come up with. However:
Overall against the structure of this proposal. The treasury is huge for a group to decide how it is managed. The DAO already targets stakeholders, and funds can be directed to the DAO over time if they prove value to those stakeholders.
As seen with the ARB grant committee all the ARB was sold without any feedback from governance. A committee with free reign to sell and do things with the treasury without much oversight would be bad for all stakeholders. There is such little oversight and information about what is being funded, and value added. I could see this happening with the treasury commitee. ARB to USDC swap
I am for treasury management programs that are ran through the DAO as experiments w/ core mechanisms that increase the protocol’s mission, with smaller funds seeded from the treasury via votes.
Once a treasury mechanism is found then it can be implimented ie. Like the uniswap v3 fee switch.