Hey @kohei, appreciate the input.
The post-BSL process discussion goes further into the new stakeholders disclosure process. Transparently displaying the entities involved in deployments is imperative. Ideally, the stakeholders selected compose a coherent team that can get the job done from both administrating the governance process as well as deploying the v3 contracts properly.
The way this proposal came about was through an increasing community demand for the Moonbeam deployment. Correspondingly, we (Michigan Blockchain) spoke with Moonbeam stakeholders regarding proposal details, along with a potential bridge provider. We settled on Wormhole. And GFX Labs became the deployer since they have previous experience with such work. It was simply an effective collaboration.
However, this RFC is the place for the Uni community to discuss who they think are the best stakeholders for this proposal going forward. It’s certainly amendable, given that the community signals an alteration to the current stakeholder lineup as favorable.
We also may want to create a post that acts as a running thread of entities who would like to be involved in future deployments. That way, groups can network and create teams for potential deployments.