Appreciate the comment, @blueberryboy.
Yes, the possibility of implementing a multi-bridge system is ever growing; however, nothing in that vein has fully materialized. That structure is currently being reviewed, debated, and tested. No previous deployment has implemented such a standard. Due to the novel nature of a multi-bridge architecture, this proposal prompts Uni delegates and tokenholders to choose LayerZero as the messaging system because it’s simply the path of least resistance–not to mention LZ has worked actively with Avalanche in the past. The relationship is there. And LZ has a proven history of reliability due to active interrogations with a multitude of applications. If in the future the DAO selects to opt into a multi-bridge system, that’s its prerogative. But for now, LZ is the most seamless means forward.
If you’d like more context on the multi-bridge system, check out this forum page: Cross-Chain Bridge Assessment Process