# URGENT discussion on current vote: "Reduce UNI Governance Proposal & Quorum Thresholds"

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/urgent-discussion-on-current-vote-reduce-uni-governance-proposal-quorum-thresholds/7117>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [October 13, 2020, 12:52pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/urgent-discussion-on-current-vote-reduce-uni-governance-proposal-quorum-thresholds/7117 "2020-10-13T12:52:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![uni0](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/uni0/32/1500_2.png) [@uni0](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/uni0)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2020, 12:50pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/urgent-discussion-on-current-vote-reduce-uni-governance-proposal-quorum-thresholds/7117/10 "2020-10-14T12:50:22Z")

</div>

These two changes do NOT achieve a single goal.  
Letting people propose easier is NOT the same as reaching quorum easier.

Gauntlet and Dharma collectively [have 30m votes](https://ondkloss.github.io/uniswapdelegates/#/), they are proposing a 30m quorum so that they can push through any proposal they like. (Dharma might feel strongly about [one particular proposal](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/retroactive-airdrop-excludes-proxy-contract-users-e-g-dharma-matcha-etc/1222))

We can only hope that people that haven’t voted yet see this as the attack on governance that it is and

**VOTE NO!**

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/urgent-discussion-on-current-vote-reduce-uni-governance-proposal-quorum-thresholds/7117)._